User contributions for 109.79.161.229
Appearance
Results for 109.79.161.229 talk block log logs global block log filter log
3 April 2019
- 01:3001:30, 3 April 2019 diff hist −76 Winter Ridge WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed. Only 1 review listed at Rotten Tomatoes, the 2/5 review from the Guardian which is already included.
- 01:2801:28, 3 April 2019 diff hist −1 Critical Mass (film) WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed.
- 01:2601:26, 3 April 2019 diff hist −27 Terror in the Mall WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed. Zero reviews on Rotten Tomatoes.
- 01:2501:25, 3 April 2019 diff hist +432 Day-O (film) Only 1 review listed at Rotten Tomatoes, so include the review. (Also WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed.)
- 01:2201:22, 3 April 2019 diff hist −38 Pecking Order (film) More than 20 reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, I don't think the outdated Notability tag is appropriate any more.
- 01:2101:21, 3 April 2019 diff hist +26 Pecking Order (film) RT 95%/20
- 01:1701:17, 3 April 2019 diff hist +168 I Want Your Money Quote "hagiography and hatchet job"
- 01:1101:11, 3 April 2019 diff hist −247 I Want Your Money 8 reviews 1 positve, 13% score. (Audience score not allowed, WP:UGC)
- 01:0701:07, 3 April 2019 diff hist −40 Control Factor WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed. Zero critic reviews listed.
- 01:0501:05, 3 April 2019 diff hist +124 The Great & the Small WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed. Only two reviews listed on Rotten Tomatoes, both arleady included. Rephrase praise from Variety magazine.
- 01:0101:01, 3 April 2019 diff hist +48 Alchemy (film) WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed. Zero critic reviews listed.
- 00:5900:59, 3 April 2019 diff hist −94 The Sleeping Room WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed.
- 00:5400:54, 3 April 2019 diff hist +87 First Target WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed. Zero critic reviews on Rotten Tomatoes.
- 00:4800:48, 3 April 2019 diff hist +45 Next of Kin (1982 film) RT 5 reviews, all positive, 100%. (Also WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed.)
- 00:4500:45, 3 April 2019 diff hist −40 Timemaster (film) Zero score based on zero reviews is meaningless. Also WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed.
- 00:4300:43, 3 April 2019 diff hist +20 Def-Con 4 WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed. Zero reviews, no conclusion can be drawn.
- 00:4100:41, 3 April 2019 diff hist −18 American Animals weighted average Tag: wikilinks removed
- 00:3700:37, 3 April 2019 diff hist +22 Murder a la Mod Only 1 review listed on Rotten Tomatoes, don't use it. WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed. Add proper reference for that 1 review.
- 00:3400:34, 3 April 2019 diff hist +774 User talk:DavidAnstiss →Please don't add Audiences scores: new section
- 00:2800:28, 3 April 2019 diff hist −49 Grande École (film) WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed.
2 April 2019
- 23:5223:52, 2 April 2019 diff hist −4,287 List of British films of 2011 This may have been added in good faith many years ago but it simply doesn't meet the standards of Wikipedia 2019. IMDB is not a reliable source, user voter score are even less reliable. WP:RS and WP:UGC are very clears. Also this article has been unsourced for years. Undid revision 890694104 Tag: Undo
- 23:4923:49, 2 April 2019 diff hist +1 User talk:109.79.161.229 No edit summary current
- 23:4923:49, 2 April 2019 diff hist +583 Talk:List of British films of 2011 No edit summary
- 23:4423:44, 2 April 2019 diff hist −7,320 List of British films of 2012 Yes it is a major edit but I did clearly explain my reasoning, WP:RS is pretty fundamental. See also Talk:List_of_British_films_of_2011 Undid revision 890694403 Tag: Undo
- 23:4123:41, 2 April 2019 diff hist +43 User talk:Zoe Trent Fan No edit summary
- 23:4023:40, 2 April 2019 diff hist +622 User talk:109.79.161.229 I did provide edit summaries.
- 23:3623:36, 2 April 2019 diff hist −7,320 List of British films of 2012 WP:RS and WP:UGC. Audiences scores not allowed and this attempt at an overview is deeply flawed. Beyond salvage.
- 23:3123:31, 2 April 2019 diff hist −4,325 List of British films of 2011 Deeply flawed. Beyond salvage. A dumpster fire. Discuss on talk page. (Delete whole misguided attempt at Overview and average.) Tag: section blanking
- 23:2123:21, 2 April 2019 diff hist +706 Talk:List of British films of 2011 →Critical reception: new section
- 23:1623:16, 2 April 2019 diff hist −4,496 List of British films of 2011 WP:UGC Audience score not allowed. Not reliable WP:RS. The methodology here was awful, the sources are reliable to begin with and then average were taken despite various gaps in the data.
- 23:0823:08, 2 April 2019 diff hist +7 Backgammon (film) No edit summary
- 22:5422:54, 2 April 2019 diff hist −105 Backgammon (film) WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed. Metacritic audience score not allowed either and failed to even include the critic score for Metacritic.
- 22:5022:50, 2 April 2019 diff hist −48 Sunset (1988 film) →Reception: WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed.
- 22:4922:49, 2 April 2019 diff hist −74 The Whole Nine Yards (film) Primary language only. Ref improve. Origin of the title not relevant but the meaning of the phrase might be helpful.
- 22:4122:41, 2 April 2019 diff hist +305 The Whole Ten Yards WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed. Fix Reception section, what a mess.
- 22:3222:32, 2 April 2019 diff hist −46 Forest Warrior WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed.
- 22:3022:30, 2 April 2019 diff hist +4 Modigliani (film) Fix reference.
- 22:2922:29, 2 April 2019 diff hist +323 Modigliani (film) WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes Audience score not allowed. Infobox gross and article body didn't match.
- 22:1822:18, 2 April 2019 diff hist −186 The Five-Year Engagement Remove attempt at summary of reviews that isn't properly backed by sourced. Avoid site specific jargon, use positive and negative instead of fresh and rotten. WP:UGC user voted web polls (audience score) not allowed. Add Cinemascore. Tag: references removed
- 21:4721:47, 2 April 2019 diff hist +216 Five Feet Apart Update Tag: Undo
- 18:2318:23, 2 April 2019 diff hist +22 Home (Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros song) See WP:NAMEDREFS. It is better to use meaningful reference names whenever possible, as recommended by the guidelines.
- 17:0217:02, 2 April 2019 diff hist +9 Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse Copyedit. Statement of fact is worryingly close to advertising, needs more insight.
- 07:2607:26, 2 April 2019 diff hist +594 User talk:95.93.201.166 Continued disruptive editing.
- 07:1707:17, 2 April 2019 diff hist +65 Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse Avoid WP:PUFFERY Undid revision 890568775 by 95.93.201.166 (talk) Tag: Undo
- 07:1607:16, 2 April 2019 diff hist −616 Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse In accordance with WP:PLOTSUM, please keep this plot summary between 400 to 700 words. Undid revision 890581072 by 2605:E000:2157:3B00:4885:F36:6981:5A15 (talk) Tag: Undo