User contributions for 122.108.140.210

28 May 2012

• 12:4412:44, 28 May 2012 diff hist +7 Electrical muscle stimulation →FDA certification: in the USA

28 March 2012

• 23:0523:05, 28 March 2012 diff hist +22 5.56×45mm NATO →5.6mm Gw Pat 90: wikify

22 March 2012

• 22:0722:07, 22 March 2012 diff hist +111 Face value (disambiguation) idiom

17 February 2012

• 13:0513:05, 17 February 2012 diff hist +240 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →reliable sources and basic structure for article revision: Emerald database

29 January 2012

• 23:0323:03, 29 January 2012 diff hist +306 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Nocross 2008?: I made a change that tried to take into account your objections

21 January 2012

• 00:3600:36, 21 January 2012 diff hist +574 User talk:Encyclotadd →definitions of NLP: you should also read "The Brain That Changes Itself" by Norman Doidge, or any of V S Ramachandrin's work

17 January 2012

• 08:4608:46, 17 January 2012 diff hist +660 User talk:Encyclotadd →definitions of NLP: new section

8 January 2012

• 07:0507:05, 8 January 2012 diff hist +39 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →edit to Scientific criticism section: ce
• 06:5106:51, 8 January 2012 diff hist +1 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Related article creation: m
• 06:4606:46, 8 January 2012 diff hist +1,574 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →edit to Scientific criticism section: I admit there are articles that shine a positive light on NLP as well (or don't dismiss it as pseudoscience and suggest further research)
• 05:1005:10, 8 January 2012 diff hist +292 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →edit to Scientific criticism section: You need to accept that Sharpley's (1984, 1987) critique dominates the empirical literature.
• 03:5403:54, 8 January 2012 diff hist +546 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →edit to Scientific criticism section: That "Social Science International" is notable journal, is it?
• 03:3703:37, 8 January 2012 diff hist +644 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Science of excellence, Heap: Heap was not claiming that NLP is a "science of excellence"

7 January 2012

• 02:5402:54, 7 January 2012 diff hist +163 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Science of excellence, Heap: Sounds like strawman argument.
• 02:4902:49, 7 January 2012 diff hist +462 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Related article creation: the publisher Real People Press is not independent of NLP so it is not reliable in wikipedia terms.

4 January 2012

• 13:0913:09, 4 January 2012 diff hist +305 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →RfC request: LKK, You missed the point.
• 12:5112:51, 4 January 2012 diff hist +461 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →RfC request: What search terms did you use?
• 12:4112:41, 4 January 2012 diff hist +371 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →"certain", "a number of" or "some" neuroscientists etc?: Do you think that is an acceptable source, and why?
• 12:2512:25, 4 January 2012 diff hist +1,551 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Science of excellence, Heap: You need to find reliable third party sources which discuss the claims made by the originators.
• 12:0612:06, 4 January 2012 diff hist +322 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Related article creation: Self-published sources should not be automatically removed.
• 04:1804:18, 4 January 2012 diff hist +86 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →RfC request: http://www.stanford.edu/~wasow/
• 04:1404:14, 4 January 2012 diff hist +1,068 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →RfC request: turf wars...

3 January 2012

• 10:1210:12, 3 January 2012 diff hist +249 User talk:122.108.140.210 →January 2012: you're not impartial
• 01:5401:54, 3 January 2012 diff hist +754 Neuro-linguistic programming reinsert the OED definition as per note on discussion -- your reason for removing the OED definition is unjustified LKK - I challenge you to find a more reliable source!
• 01:4601:46, 3 January 2012 diff hist +415 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →OED definition: I think we should get a third party comment on including OED definition again.
• 01:4001:40, 3 January 2012 diff hist +577 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →issue with citing Glasner-Edwards and Rawson in lead: I made a mistake here.
• 01:3001:30, 3 January 2012 diff hist +455 User talk:Lam Kin Keung No edit summary
• 01:2601:26, 3 January 2012 diff hist +72 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →"certain", "a number of" or "some" neuroscientists etc?: i mean why
• 01:2301:23, 3 January 2012 diff hist +720 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →"certain", "a number of" or "some" neuroscientists etc?: new section
• 01:0101:01, 3 January 2012 diff hist −3 Neuro-linguistic programming Undid revision 469083918 by Lam Kin Keung - you're right - it has (an unintended?) dual meaning... some or "a number of" is preferable.
• 00:1800:18, 3 January 2012 diff hist +393 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Let's move the Skeptic Society references to a single section of the article: you seem to be constructing a strawman

2 January 2012

• 08:0108:01, 2 January 2012 diff hist +996 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Let's move the Skeptic Society references to a single section of the article: If you are paraphrasing what it says in reliable sources then you are not engaged in original research

1 January 2012

• 00:0700:07, 1 January 2012 diff hist +417 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Let's move the Skeptic Society references to a single section of the article: Also, are there any reliable sources that challenge the viewpoint of Beyerstein, Witkowski, Stollznow, Drenth, Heap, Lilienfeld, and Drenth?

31 December 2011

• 16:3516:35, 31 December 2011 diff hist +501 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →VK/D: Is there a good academic article which describes the classic techniques in NLP?
• 16:2416:24, 31 December 2011 diff hist +238 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →VK/D: add doi and ref for A Review of Visual/Kinesthetic Disassociation in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Disorders: Theory, Efficacy and Practice Recommendations

27 December 2011

• 23:2023:20, 27 December 2011 diff hist +437 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →G. Brent Angell (2011) NLP Theory and Social Work Treatment: So in general, can we agree that...
• 15:1915:19, 27 December 2011 diff hist +386 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →G. Brent Angell (2011) NLP Theory and Social Work Treatment: We'd need to discuss in general before making any specific amendments.
• 08:0308:03, 27 December 2011 diff hist −274 Neuro-linguistic programming seriously I think this better reflects the reliable sources
• 07:5907:59, 27 December 2011 diff hist +255 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →G. Brent Angell (2011) NLP Theory and Social Work Treatment: I thought it could be a bit more collaborative.
• 07:3607:36, 27 December 2011 diff hist +443 Neuro-linguistic programming add citations for area of application
• 07:0807:08, 27 December 2011 diff hist −275 Neuro-linguistic programming Glasner-Edwards.S.,Rawson.R. cited the Norcross paper so cite it directly
• 06:5906:59, 27 December 2011 diff hist +677 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Reorganisation of article - work in progress: norcross 2006, 2010
• 06:4606:46, 27 December 2011 diff hist +20 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →G. Brent Angell (2011) NLP Theory and Social Work Treatment: ISBN 9780195394658
• 05:5205:52, 27 December 2011 diff hist +24 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →G. Brent Angell (2011) NLP Theory and Social Work Treatment: Francis J Turner (ed.)..
• 05:4905:49, 27 December 2011 diff hist +721 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →G. Brent Angell (2011) NLP Theory and Social Work Treatment: new section
• 02:2002:20, 27 December 2011 diff hist +103 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Eisner 2000: full citation for eisner book chapter

26 December 2011

• 14:0814:08, 26 December 2011 diff hist +325 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Eisner 2000: It is also best to avoid hiding all disputations in an end criticism section, but instead work for integrated, easy to read, and accurate article prose
• 09:1909:19, 26 December 2011 diff hist +360 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Reorganisation of article - work in progress: I'm looking through the policies to try to explain what is wrong about the current structure.
• 08:4208:42, 26 December 2011 diff hist +253 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Eisner 2000: Encyclotadd
• 08:2308:23, 26 December 2011 diff hist −365 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Reorganisation of article - work in progress: Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming/policy