User contributions for 86.121.137.79

27 January 2015

• 11:5011:50, 27 January 2015 diff hist +37 F-1 (nuclear reactor) No edit summary
• 11:4711:47, 27 January 2015 diff hist +99 Chicago Pile-1 →See also
• 11:4611:46, 27 January 2015 diff hist +73 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant →See also
• 11:2911:29, 27 January 2015 diff hist −2 Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Station →Later reactors: adjust image positions
• 11:2711:27, 27 January 2015 diff hist +106 Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Station →References
• 11:2611:26, 27 January 2015 diff hist +811 Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Station →Early reactors
• 11:2211:22, 27 January 2015 diff hist −44 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant →Further reading: added it to the wrong article
• 11:2011:20, 27 January 2015 diff hist +44 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant →Further reading
• 10:5510:55, 27 January 2015 diff hist +310 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant →References
• 10:4810:48, 27 January 2015 diff hist 0 Nikolay Dollezhal →Further reading
• 10:4510:45, 27 January 2015 diff hist +221 Nikolay Dollezhal →References
• 10:4210:42, 27 January 2015 diff hist +24 Nikolay Dollezhal No edit summary
• 10:3410:34, 27 January 2015 diff hist +217 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant No edit summary

26 January 2015

• 18:1918:19, 26 January 2015 diff hist +84 Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Station →Early reactors
• 18:1518:15, 26 January 2015 diff hist +533 Supercritical water reactor this idea isn't as new as this article presents it to be
• 18:0818:08, 26 January 2015 diff hist +1 Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Station →Early reactors
• 18:0718:07, 26 January 2015 diff hist 0 Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Station No edit summary
• 18:0718:07, 26 January 2015 diff hist +437 Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Station make section for first reactors and add a bit about them; move the bulk of the stuff about later reactors to its own sections
• 17:5017:50, 26 January 2015 diff hist −1 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant →See also
• 17:5017:50, 26 January 2015 diff hist +388 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant still they were clearly behind in larger scale production.
• 17:3817:38, 26 January 2015 diff hist +351 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant I can even find IAEA paperwork to call it so.
• 17:2817:28, 26 January 2015 diff hist +3 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant →See also
• 17:2717:27, 26 January 2015 diff hist +33 Shippingport Atomic Power Station →See also
• 17:2617:26, 26 January 2015 diff hist +48 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant No edit summary
• 17:2517:25, 26 January 2015 diff hist +144 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant →See also
• 17:2317:23, 26 January 2015 diff hist +39 Magnox →See also
• 17:2017:20, 26 January 2015 diff hist +306 Magnox →Economics
• 17:1817:18, 26 January 2015 diff hist +69 Magnox →See also
• 17:1517:15, 26 January 2015 diff hist +161 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant →See also
• 16:5816:58, 26 January 2015 diff hist +6 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant No edit summary
• 16:5616:56, 26 January 2015 diff hist +5 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant No edit summary
• 16:5616:56, 26 January 2015 diff hist +253 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant 2nd source for this claim, although this one does add the small-scale caveat.
• 16:4616:46, 26 January 2015 diff hist 0 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant ibid
• 16:4516:45, 26 January 2015 diff hist +55 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant I swear Google Books is going down the toilet with their metadata quality of today.
• 16:3816:38, 26 January 2015 diff hist +377 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant not a research reactor but a pilot plant
• 16:2616:26, 26 January 2015 diff hist +52 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant No edit summary
• 16:2516:25, 26 January 2015 diff hist +16 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant copyedit
• 16:2416:24, 26 January 2015 diff hist +20 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant No edit summary
• 16:2416:24, 26 January 2015 diff hist −48 Obninsk Nuclear Power Plant it seems to me this is a distinction without a difference; saying it was the first grid-connected appears to solve this "controversy". EBR-I was not grid connected and BORAX-III came only slightly later (1955)
• 10:2010:20, 26 January 2015 diff hist 0 Varicap →Substitutes for varicap diodes: stupid me for trusting stupid google books to get any date right
• 10:1810:18, 26 January 2015 diff hist +2 Varicap →Substitutes for varicap diodes
• 10:1710:17, 26 January 2015 diff hist +306 Varicap →Substitutes for varicap diodes: +ref for the obvious and clarification request for the less so

25 January 2015

• 10:0410:04, 25 January 2015 diff hist +13 China XD Group need to mention GE stake etc. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/08/ge-xd-idUSL1E8G78KH20120508
• 09:5609:56, 25 January 2015 diff hist +36 Capacitor voltage transformer →External links
• 09:5309:53, 25 January 2015 diff hist +38 Capacitor voltage transformer →External links: ??? It's not even clear if that is even a CVT. If we're gonna have marketing brochures here, at least put one that's somewhat informative, like this one from GE.

24 January 2015

• 11:1911:19, 24 January 2015 diff hist +7 Bidirected graph def given there actually
• 11:1811:18, 24 January 2015 diff hist +5 Bidirected graph No edit summary
• 11:1711:17, 24 January 2015 diff hist +237 Bidirected graph →Other meanings: indeed this I found and understood
• 11:1511:15, 24 January 2015 diff hist +187 Talk:Bidirected graph →What the hell is def even trying to say?: new section
• 11:1511:15, 24 January 2015 diff hist +14 Bidirected graph this text is alas incomprehensible to me; the article badly needs a picture. I found the term "biderected" to means something simpler in other texts: https://books.google.com/books?id=H2BDafez-A0C&pg=PA171