User contributions for Achar Sva
Results for Achar Sva talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 8,691 edits. Account created on 5 November 2019.
14 October 2024
- 02:4302:43, 14 October 2024 diff hist −684 Genesis creation narrative →Hexameral literature: This is not notable enough to have its own subsection Tag: Reverted
- 01:0901:09, 14 October 2024 diff hist +412 Talk:Genesis creation narrative →Composition of the narrative: new section Tag: New topic
- 01:0601:06, 14 October 2024 diff hist +193 Talk:Genesis creation narrative →Expanding the 'Hexameral literature' section
- 00:5800:58, 14 October 2024 diff hist +460 Talk:Cambodia →Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2024 current
- 00:5500:55, 14 October 2024 diff hist −36 Cambodia →French colonisation: correction: the Protectorate began in 1863, not 1867 - so far as I know, nothing significant happened in that year. current Tag: Disambiguation links added
- 00:4900:49, 14 October 2024 diff hist −114 Massacre of the Innocents the source cited (Clark) says nothing about the veneration of the Holy Innocents - I have no objection to including a refence to them, but it needs a source that actually mentions them and their worship/veneration
- 00:4400:44, 14 October 2024 diff hist −396 Massacre of the Innocents I don't think we can count Arthur George as an RS - he's not, so far as I can see, a recognised biblical scholar.
- 00:3900:39, 14 October 2024 diff hist −294 Gospel The quote from Stanton merely repeats what the preceding sentence already says Tags: Undo Reverted
12 October 2024
- 21:2121:21, 12 October 2024 diff hist +116 Esther →Historicity: From previous edit: this sentence seems more representative of scholarly opinion and can be put back current
- 21:1921:19, 12 October 2024 diff hist +395 Esther Undid revision 1247653687 by Potatín5 (talk)The former version (the reverted version) is well referenced and appears to represent the weight of scholarly opinion Tag: Undo
- 20:3020:30, 12 October 2024 diff hist −24 m Book of Daniel shorten sentence, no change to meaning current
11 October 2024
- 08:5808:58, 11 October 2024 diff hist −1,868 Abraham A 1915 book cannot, by any stretch, be called current scholarship
23 August 2024
- 09:1709:17, 23 August 2024 diff hist −6 Book of Daniel That it's "from Judea" is not really of any significance
- 09:1409:14, 23 August 2024 diff hist −21 Cambodia →French colonisation: Norodom definitely was not installed by Siam: the important point is not his "installation" anyway, but the treaty with France
- 09:0909:09, 23 August 2024 diff hist −30 Royal Palace of Cambodia →History: Mak was associated with the Silver Pagoda, but not the main palace (he was too young) current
- 09:0709:07, 23 August 2024 diff hist −151 Royal Palace of Cambodia I think this is what the paragraph is trying to say - it needs more on the 20th century rebuilding
- 08:5808:58, 23 August 2024 diff hist −29 Phnom Penh →History: It was King Norodom who employed le Faucheur, and the shophouses were brick.
1 August 2024
- 05:2305:23, 1 August 2024 diff hist −13 Genesis 1:1 →Analysis: rearrange sentence breaks for better grammar
31 July 2024
- 10:1110:11, 31 July 2024 diff hist −172 Genesis creation narrative →First day: Sarna does not say that the parallel is superficial
- 07:2307:23, 31 July 2024 diff hist −1,122 Isaiah 7:14 →Simeon tradition: not really relevant
- 07:2207:22, 31 July 2024 diff hist −18 Isaiah 7:14 not said by some.
- 02:2602:26, 31 July 2024 diff hist −28 Royal Palace of Cambodia →History: Definitely not Tep Nimith Mak - he was born in 1856, making him just 10 years old in 1566. See George Groslier, “Soixante-seize dessins Cambodgiens”, Arts et Archéologie khmers, Société d’Edition Géographique, Maritime et Coloniale, 1921-1923, tome 1 fascicule 3, p.332.
30 July 2024
- 03:0903:09, 30 July 2024 diff hist +516 Talk:Daniel 8 →"The 2,300 evenings and mornings" section current
29 July 2024
- 09:2109:21, 29 July 2024 diff hist −43 Daniel 8 Undid revision 1235720889 by Herostratus (talk)Collins is RS, you can't just delete because you disagree current Tag: Undo
- 09:1809:18, 29 July 2024 diff hist +976 Daniel's final vision revert unexplained deletion current Tag: Manual revert
- 09:1609:16, 29 July 2024 diff hist −222 Darius the Mede Revert - subsequent edits are not an improvement Tag: Manual revert
- 05:1605:16, 29 July 2024 diff hist −93 Book of Daniel This older version is clearer and more concise.
19 March 2024
- 04:2404:24, 19 March 2024 diff hist −5,869 Census of Quirinius →Old references: These are not scholarly sources Tag: Reverted
26 February 2024
- 23:3123:31, 26 February 2024 diff hist −854 Census of Quirinius →Religious defences: not RS.
10 February 2024
- 07:3507:35, 10 February 2024 diff hist −549 Census of Quirinius →Religious defences: use academic sources
12 January 2024
- 23:5323:53, 12 January 2024 diff hist −139 Royal Palace of Cambodia →Napoleon Pavilion: based on primary sources
17 November 2023
- 07:2307:23, 17 November 2023 diff hist −18 User talk:Achar Sva No edit summary
- 07:1807:18, 17 November 2023 diff hist +93 User talk:Achar Sva Undid revision 1184841531 by Scorpions1325 (talk) Tag: Undo
12 November 2023
- 00:5600:56, 12 November 2023 diff hist −122,676 User talk:Achar Sva ←Replaced content with 'This user has been hounded off Wikipedia by Pbritti and the Catholic mafia.' Tag: Replaced
9 November 2023
- 02:3502:35, 9 November 2023 diff hist +150 User talk:Achar Sva →Restriction violation
- 02:1702:17, 9 November 2023 diff hist −5 User talk:Achar Sva →Restriction violation
- 02:1702:17, 9 November 2023 diff hist +186 User talk:Achar Sva →Restriction violation
- 02:1602:16, 9 November 2023 diff hist −166 User talk:Achar Sva →August 2023 Tag: Manual revert
- 02:1502:15, 9 November 2023 diff hist +166 User talk:Achar Sva →August 2023 Tag: Reverted
8 November 2023
- 20:3820:38, 8 November 2023 diff hist −1 Genesis 1:1 The reference doesn't extend beyond one scholar Tag: Reverted
- 20:3620:36, 8 November 2023 diff hist −534 Gospel Undid revision 1184155699 by Pbritti (talk)it doesn't represent a significant pov, which is a sine qua non Tags: Undo Reverted
- 20:3520:35, 8 November 2023 diff hist −61 Lewis's trilemma this cite is not attached to any point in the sentence beyond "biblical scholars"
- 08:4908:49, 8 November 2023 diff hist −21 Lewis's trilemma biblical scholars are the appropriate academic study, and it's a majority opinion
- 02:1502:15, 8 November 2023 diff hist −8 Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego exclusively from chapter 3 in fact
7 November 2023
- 23:5923:59, 7 November 2023 diff hist −534 Gospel →Composition: so far as I'm aware this view is limited to a single scholar Tag: Reverted
6 November 2023
- 08:1208:12, 6 November 2023 diff hist −410 Gospel →Composition: fringe pov (overwhelming majority pov is given in previous sentence) Tag: Reverted
5 November 2023
- 20:3420:34, 5 November 2023 diff hist +164 Abomination of desolation restore pinned text Tag: Manual revert
- 09:0009:00, 5 November 2023 diff hist −608 Daniel 8 →Christian eschatological readings: we discuss the date for the composition in another section, and this para adds nothing regarding Christian eschatology
- 08:5808:58, 5 November 2023 diff hist −370 Daniel 8 →Christian eschatological readings: an old source, and well outside the current scholarly consensus as given in e.g. Seow and Collins
- 08:3608:36, 5 November 2023 diff hist −111 Yahwism →Worship: the article is about Yahwism - Judaism emerged later
