User contributions for CarlGGHamilton

11 November 2019

• 14:0914:09, 11 November 2019 diff hist 0 m Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 →Specifications (MiG-25P): It's 2x R-60 missiles carriers, which each carries 2x R-60, so the aircraft can actually carry 4 missiles but in two mounts, which can also be seen in multiple photos of the MiG-25 when carrying the R-60. Tag: Visual edit

5 August 2018

• 20:0520:05, 5 August 2018 diff hist +79 m 8th Guards Combined Arms Army Operation Bagration added to engagements infobox section. This was an important operation and 8th Guards Army figures on the wikipedia page for it. Tag: Visual edit

8 July 2018

• 03:1903:19, 8 July 2018 diff hist +6 m T-64 →Cold War: T-80A is a mislabelling of early T-80Us. Surely T-80BV or T-80U is what was meant. Tag: Visual edit

8 June 2018

• 12:1412:14, 8 June 2018 diff hist −172 m Unethical human experimentation Iraq, North Korea and the USSR was mentioned in the introduction as examples, but was not mentioned at any point during the article. The introduction now only contains countries which are mentioned in the article. Tag: Visual edit

6 April 2018

• 09:4309:43, 6 April 2018 diff hist −101 m History of the Soviet Union (1982–1991) This statement in the header is not mentioned in the article and unsourced. Tag: Visual edit

26 February 2018

• 11:5411:54, 26 February 2018 diff hist +25 m Kuban Cossacks →Red Army Cossacks: A bit more consistent use of Arabic and Roman numerals for easier reading. Tag: Visual edit

6 February 2018

• 18:3018:30, 6 February 2018 diff hist +4 Talk:AK-47 →Is AK-47 based on the M1 Garand and STG-44? - concept section
• 18:3018:30, 6 February 2018 diff hist +1,821 Talk:AK-47 →Is AK-47 based on the M1 Garand and STG-44? - concept section: new section
• 17:0317:03, 6 February 2018 diff hist −149 m AK-47 This quote was taken out of context and is misleading, it is not Kalashnikov who said this, but the journalist who claims, with no evidence, that this is the case. The source is also a right wing news article, which may be biased against Kalashnikov. Tag: Visual edit

19 January 2018

• 10:1710:17, 19 January 2018 diff hist +1,036 Talk:Antony Beevor →Beevor's educational qualifications

17 November 2017

• 15:3515:35, 17 November 2017 diff hist −31 m Flag of the Soviet Union "Leftist" isn't very neutral sounding, I changed the caption to sound more neutral, and reduce the claim that it was used at leftwing rallies, to simply being popular, which is a much less severe claim. Tag: Visual edit

14 September 2017

• 09:4209:42, 14 September 2017 diff hist +934 Talk:T-34 →Armour section described almost exclusively from German and American point of view.: new section

24 August 2017

• 11:3811:38, 24 August 2017 diff hist 0 m 76 mm divisional gun M1936 (F-22) →Ammunition: The criteria is 80% not 75%, this is also what is stated on other pages. Tag: Visual edit
• 11:3511:35, 24 August 2017 diff hist −76 85 mm air defense gun M1939 (52-K) →Penetration comparison: The source states very clearly on p.59 that the criteria is 80% soviet, and not 50% British, American. This can be confirmed by viewing the same numbers from Tankarchives which has the same data for 80% soviet. Tag: Visual edit

8 August 2017

• 02:5902:59, 8 August 2017 diff hist +23 m Autoloader →Rate of fire: rephrased this part to be more accurate, the black eagle was cancelled in 2001, and should probably not be considered the newest autoloaders 16 years later. I've also stated it's actual rate of fire according to the source. Tag: Visual edit
• 02:5402:54, 8 August 2017 diff hist −170 m Autoloader →Rate of fire: Citation needed for 9 years for claim. Tag: Visual edit

8 June 2017

• 09:1409:14, 8 June 2017 diff hist −8 m Soviet offensive plans controversy →Criticism: rephrased sentence Tag: Visual edit

18 May 2017

• 13:4613:46, 18 May 2017 diff hist −357 m Droughts and famines in Russia and the Soviet Union →Soviet Famine of 1932-1933: "Many critics" is not one website. This sentence is as good as "some argue". Tag: Visual edit

15 May 2017

• 12:1712:17, 15 May 2017 diff hist +11 m Master gunner Several is not two. Tag: Visual edit

22 March 2017

• 21:4421:44, 22 March 2017 diff hist +4 m VA-111 Shkval No edit summary Tag: Visual edit

18 February 2017

• 00:1700:17, 18 February 2017 diff hist −41 Moscow Peace Treaty No edit summary Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• 00:1500:15, 18 February 2017 diff hist +1 m Moscow Peace Treaty →Background Tag: Visual edit
• 00:1100:11, 18 February 2017 diff hist +59 m Moscow Peace Treaty →Background: a lot of claims here, but i only added one citation needed, could use a lot more. Tags: nowiki added Visual edit

17 February 2017

• 23:4823:48, 17 February 2017 diff hist +529 Talk:Winter War →infobox
• 23:4123:41, 17 February 2017 diff hist −54 m Battles of Rzhev The source for german casualties is an invalid link, website doesn't exist, so I replaced it with a citation needed. Tag: Visual edit

15 February 2017

• 18:5318:53, 15 February 2017 diff hist +689 Talk:Winter War →infobox

14 February 2017

• 16:1016:10, 14 February 2017 diff hist +795 Talk:Winter War →infobox

19 January 2017

• 22:2222:22, 19 January 2017 diff hist +7 m 152 mm howitzer-gun M1937 (ML-20) →Red Army: Incomplete sentence Tag: Visual edit
• 08:2908:29, 19 January 2017 diff hist 0 m Political commissar →Red Army: Caption said 1943, description of the picture said 1942, figured this was a typo and changed it. Tag: Visual edit

25 November 2016

• 12:0712:07, 25 November 2016 diff hist +48 m Infrared homing →MANPADs: Replaced subjective claim with information related to the picture in the caption Tag: Visual edit

17 November 2016

• 07:1407:14, 17 November 2016 diff hist +77 m Siege of Harfleur →In popular culture: added another book where the siege is described, original title is "Den højeste ære" but i wrote the english title for this page. Tag: Visual edit

1 August 2016

• 14:4714:47, 1 August 2016 diff hist −47 Volksgrenadier →Battle: Tried to fix a little of the completely unneutral tone of this page. Tag: Visual edit

26 July 2016

• 04:5804:58, 26 July 2016 diff hist −277 Winter War There is no consensus for adding personal opinions to the result section. I have seen the talk page, and it wasn't there. People have many opinions on this subject even those that don't think it was a soviet victory did not agree to what it was changed to Tag: Visual edit
• 04:5504:55, 26 July 2016 diff hist +1,333 Talk:Winter War →'Soviet Victory' is Inaccurate/Misleading
• 04:4504:45, 26 July 2016 diff hist +398 Talk:Winter War →Tank losses

25 July 2016

• 08:4908:49, 25 July 2016 diff hist +9 Winter War Undid revision 731408491 by Wanderer602 (talk) Krivosheev the accepted source for casualties clearly states this, see the talk page.
• 08:4608:46, 25 July 2016 diff hist +1,036 Talk:Winter War →Tank losses
• 08:2008:20, 25 July 2016 diff hist 0 Talk:Winter War →Tank losses
• 08:2008:20, 25 July 2016 diff hist +646 Talk:Winter War →Tank losses
• 05:0405:04, 25 July 2016 diff hist −277 Winter War Undid revision 731328888 by I've clearly stated in the talk page why subjective opinions do not belong in the results, please follow the result section guidelines A D Monroe III (talk)
• 05:0205:02, 25 July 2016 diff hist +9 m Winter War See Talkpage Tag: Visual edit
• 05:0205:02, 25 July 2016 diff hist +1 Talk:Winter War →'Soviet Victory' is Inaccurate/Misleading
• 05:0105:01, 25 July 2016 diff hist +1 Talk:Winter War →'Soviet Victory' is Inaccurate/Misleading
• 05:0105:01, 25 July 2016 diff hist +2,011 Talk:Winter War →'Soviet Victory' is Inaccurate/Misleading
• 04:5204:52, 25 July 2016 diff hist −2 Talk:Winter War →Tank losses
• 04:4904:49, 25 July 2016 diff hist +954 Talk:Winter War →Tank losses

24 July 2016

• 04:3504:35, 24 July 2016 diff hist +32 N User:CarlGGHamilton my languages current Tag: Visual edit
• 03:4703:47, 24 July 2016 diff hist −2 Winter War Undid revision 731156346 by Wanderer602 (talk) tank crew casualties are not tank losses, tank losses are stated right next to it in the footnote.

23 July 2016

• 08:3308:33, 23 July 2016 diff hist −44 m Finland in World War II →Course of the war: This sentence was unsourced and contradicted the final sentence of the paragraph and source 17, seems like an oversight from a previous version that was allowed to remain. Also rephrased the language past that to be more neutral. Tag: Visual edit
• 08:2708:27, 23 July 2016 diff hist −277 Winter War The result section didn't follow the guidelines, which should be a clear and quick answer to whom won. All the information that was in the result section belongs in the main text or elsewhere in the infobox and is already avaliable there. Tag: Visual edit