User contributions for Ladysekhmet

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

00:48, 26 April 2008 Dominic talk contribs blocked Ladysekhmet talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (sockpuppet of User:Swiksek)

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

07:1007:10, 25 April 2008 diff hist +528 Talk:Stephanie Adams →"Basic human dignity: Wikipedia articles should respect the basic human dignity of their subjects." - Wikipedia: new section
07:0407:04, 25 April 2008 diff hist −552 Stephanie Adams Content added was highly defamatory, does not have anything substantial to do with the subject of the article, and has again been removed. Reverted to previous edit. Refer to discussion page.
05:4905:49, 25 April 2008 diff hist +2,213 Talk:Stephanie Adams →Removal of information
05:1605:16, 25 April 2008 diff hist +1,368 Stephanie Adams Like every other playmate, her date of birth is recorded on her playmate data sheet. And her bio. All the other information provided is in her bio as well, so it was reverted back to previous edit.

17:3917:39, 9 February 2007 diff hist +1,995 Talk:Stephanie Adams Yes, the beautiful, successful, lovable, millionaire playboy playmate, Stephanie Adams is in charge.
00:0100:01, 9 February 2007 diff hist +51 m Stephanie Adams Since when does an article have to have a reference for every single word mentioned in it? There is alot of prejudice here. I vote it stays. If anyone else agrees, just revise it along with your vote.