Talk:10 Murray Street

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 10 Murray Street article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Tasmania Low‑importance

	Australia portal 10 Murray Street is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not brutalist Architecture

I would argue that this building is not strictly an example of 'Brutalist' architecture —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.105.56 (talk) 03:37, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It is modernist, though with a Brutalist influence perhaps. Golden ninky (talk) 14:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The newspapers all publish 10 Murray Street as a Brutalist building. Unless someone shows me a link or publication telling me otherwise, I will continue to contest it being Modernist. If there are no such publications and you are merely demonstrating your opinion, then I suggest you read Wikipedia:No original research. Cheers Wiki ian 05:22, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]