Talk:2008 Beijing Wushu Tournament

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Martial arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Chinese martial arts#forms|taolu]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Macau

Mention of Macau's participation in this tournament? Significance? Macau ~~has no NOC~~ 's NOC is not a member of the IOC at the time of the 2008 olympics. --Kvasir (talk) 18:02, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Macau actually does have a NOC (Macau Olympic Committee). It doesn't compete in the Olympic Games, but does compete in the Asian Games, for example. The fact that Macau competed in this tournament clearly illustrates that this wasn't an Olympic event, not even an official demonstration sport. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 18:11, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What i meant was an NOC that isn't a member of the IOC. Well the tone of this article seems to elude toward a link with the official games, based on organisation, format, IOC's permission to host, etc. So was the fact someone made the point of mentioning this tournament in the Beijing 2008 article. Just something to point out perhaps. --Kvasir (talk) 18:39, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't an olympic event, so it can not use the olympic rings, but under the special permisson of IOC(olympic game event do not need special permisson by IOC), it can use all olympic elements except olympic rings.

And as it isn't a olympic game event, so the participation is required to be a member of the IWUF, not IOC.Tony Black (talk) 06:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Subarticles

Hi to whomever reads this. I am debating whether to create subarticles per each event. Not only are medal tables already listed per each event, but the detailed results and match brackets are also listed which creates some redundancy and makes the single page article quite long. What do any of you think? Thanks. Yinglong999 (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 20:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the 2008 Beijing Wushu Tournament took place alongside the 2008 Summer Olympics? [1]

Comment: Article originally created my Moshen1258

5x expanded by Yinglong999 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:04, 22 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Ineligible, for two reasons: (1) this was included in the nominations for expansions made on February 13, but the nomination was not made until April 22, long past the deadline for nominations. (2) It is still not a 5x expansion, even over that well-beyond-rules expansion timeframe. As of February 4, before the recent expansion efforts, it had 1983 bytes of text. Now it has 6752, well short of 5x. Even if we go as far back as the September 5 version, it is not a 5x expansion. Additionally, as it has been more or less stable for the last month, expansion would now need to be measured against the current version, not the February 4 version. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Professor Eppstein. Since this is my first DYK nomination, I did not know about the fivefold and the deadline rules, thus I completely understand why the article is illegible for nomination. Thank you. Yinglong999 (talk) 22:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]