Talk:200 (Stargate SG-1)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 200 (Stargate SG-1) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

200 (Stargate SG-1) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 18, 2011.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 16, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
February 4, 2008	Featured article candidate	Promoted
March 18, 2008	Featured topic candidate	Not promoted

Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / Stargate Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Stargate task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Good article

This article is well written and well referenced, and meets all of the GA criteria... Johnfos (talk) 01:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding Farscape reference

I haven't written much in the area of fiction, so I'm not sure how to deal with sourcing, but I thought part of the joke with the Farscape reference was that two of the characters in the SG-1 episode starred in Farscape (Ben Browder and Claudia Black). I'm surprised that doesn't get a mention. Sχeptomaniac^{χαιρετε} 06:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get why it wasn't mentioned either considering it's pretty much the only aspect of the episode people talk about. I've added it. If someone really needs a source to verify that Black and Browder co-starred together I'm sure there's a billion magazine articles out there. Pick one. 68.146.81.123 (talk) 06:19, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to the article

I just added 2 paragraphs, one about the writing process and another about Richard Dean Anderson's appearance. I'm preparing to create a spoken version of the article soon. Please let me know if you have any concerns about the article, so changes can be incorporated before I do the recording. Thanks! --Fang Aili ^talk 06:29, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No issues, I just did some minor WP:MOS-compliance cleanup. Look forward to hearing the article! Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 15:59, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

furlings not mentioned?

actually shocked this wasn't added with all the other big first time and cross over data but the episode 200 actually is the first time the 4th of the great races are shown on an episode.(4 races being asgard,ancient, furling and i forget thoose weird tree cloacking hippies from first few seasons name).

they are verbally talked about from time to time but in the previously on stargate script they are parodied by having the first ever meeting encounter with furlings. a scene that gets many a fan in a what the hell moment of not remembering that "previous" episode.152.91.9.153 (talk) 18:46, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't actually "shown", the lack of their appearances is parodied. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:08, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lead: “1.9 average household rating”

In my opinion, the phrase “a 1.9 average household rating” should be reworded to be more understandable and then copied to Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 18, 2011 before it appears on the Main Page. Electrical & computer engineer (talk) 03:26, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have any suggestions? It's somewhat difficult to explain without knowing television rankings. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 15:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wikilinked the word “rating” to Ratings (broadcast). I’m not sure enough of what it means well enough to reword it myself. (My best guess is that 1.9 percent of households selected by Nielsen Media Research watched the show.) Electrical & computer engineer (talk) 03:15, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 200 (Stargate SG-1). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 200 (Stargate SG-1). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120427143054/http://www.gateworld.net/news/2005/09/sci_fi_to_reinstate_full-length_.shtml to http://www.gateworld.net/news/2005/09/sci_fi_to_reinstate_full-length_.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 200 (Stargate SG-1). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080125130348/http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/08/200_ratings_give_istargatei_need.shtml to http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/08/200_ratings_give_istargatei_need.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]