Talk:2016–2019 United Kingdom railway strikes

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK / in London Low‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Formal end?

I think the heading "Formal end" is premature but I have not changed it. Roberttherambler (talk) 20:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, Think it might be a bit premature, but I wasn't sure how to make the title sound "neutral" (not violating NPOV), so that's the best I thought of. Is "An end in sight?" a more appropriate title? Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 11:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps we should leave it for a few weeks and see what happens. Roberttherambler (talk) 11:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wait and see how many ASLEF members join RMT... Incidentally, 'Aftermath' is probably a better section header than 'End.'O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 11:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What was the outcome of these strikes? Unsuccessful, presumably? The page title suggests they're still ongoing as of 2019, but the last update in the article is from 2018... Robofish (talk) 22:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested move plus comment

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus for the proposed title (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 01:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2016–2019 United Kingdom rail strikes → 2016-2018 United Kingdom rail strikes – No strikes on article appear to be from 2019 - all appear to be from 2018 or before. Nightfury 13:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC) May I also add isn't it worth closing this as a current event, with the date being the end of the last strike? Nightfury 13:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the proposed new title, this article documents a series of related strikes, and patently the article is WP:NOTFINISHED. Its lede starts "Major industrial action in the form of periodic strikes and protests have been ongoing" (my emphasis) and see e.g. see BBC News here about South Western Railway strikes in December 2019 (which were scheduled to finish at 23:59 on 1 January 2020) and South Western Railway planned strikes called off in March 2020 (BBC News of 3 March). So if anything we should make it 2020 or Rail Strikes in the UK since 2016 or something.... Oddly, South Western is not mentioned in the body text of the article. It makes sense to change the title, but not to that proposed. 94.21.78.115 (talk) 07:45, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tut, tut. Industrial action has been ongoing. I'll change that. 94.21.78.115 (talk) 07:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposal To Fix Mismatch of Dates: To set end date as the final strike day/month

I would propose that an actual final strike date/month is used as the end. Daesin (talk) 12:48, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]