Jump to content

Talk:2020s

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lead image montage (outer space please)

[edit]

Can we at least add one photo showing 2020s space advancement in the lead image montage so it's not just all photos of death and destruction?... I.e., James Webb Space Telescope, Ingenuity helicopter, Lunar Gateway, Artemis program, etc., etc. Thanks. ~ Flyedit32 (talk) 02:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we were to add one image, what would you pick? I also note that neither the section 2020s § Science and technology, nor the article 2020s in science and technology have any images attached. It might be productive to start with those. — HTGS (talk) 02:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't matter. Pick one - as long as it's not a picture of disease or devastation. How about this, taken from the JWST in '22. Appreciate the help.
~ Flyedit32 (talk) 02:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead images?

[edit]

I’m glad the topic above added space to broaden the scope beyond war and disease. AI was a good addition. To better align the images with the Wikipedia articles from past decades, should we include images more related to socio-cultural changes? And include more people/leaders that might be more recognizable or symbolic? For example, the Ukraine plane photo is OK, but perhaps we could use a photo of Zelensky in the early days of the invasion — more instantly recognizable, less liable to be confused with the other images of rubble, and even in line with the trend towards social media representation in global politics. And aligned with many other Wikipedia decade articles.

To broaden the scope beyond war, maybe add a Taylor Swift concert (thinking of the Beatles in the 1960s wikipedia article image montage) or anything else relevant to global popular culture? Diegojosesalva (talk) 16:53, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For what it’s worth, we used to have different images, including one of Zelensky (see [1]). I don’t remember why it was removed, but I suspect it may have been seen as non-neutral. An image that speaks to the change in monarch (either in Charles's coronation or Elizabeth’s death) would be sensible to bring back in my opinion though.
For the record, I am not opposed to Zelensky’s inclusion, but would like to see consensus in support before restoring him. Note we might include Netanyahu for similar reasons, and would lead to similar disputes about neutrality. — HTGS (talk) 06:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trump bias?

[edit]

Why does the 2024 election coverage talk about the fact that if Trump wins ("emerges victorious", weird phrasing) he'd be the 2nd president to serve a non-consecutive term, and says absolutely nothing about the fact that if Kamala Harris "emerges victorious" she'd be the very first female president of the united states? 2600:1700:5AB0:BFC0:9DA1:B974:5570:7158 (talk) 20:35, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Generative AI

[edit]

The section on AI reads like an advertisement for OpenAI. I think it’s premature to conclude this technology is of such importance to the 2020s decade that it belongs in the lead.

In addition, food delivery apps…a major innovation, really? They were done before in the 2000s and many of them went bankrupt as the first internet bubble imploded. The only reason the current generation of delivery apps hasn’t is 15 years of low interest rates from 2008-22; many of the big names are yet to be profitable.

I think most people are in agreement the biggest news for the decade so far have been COVID first and the foreign conflicts (Ukraine-Russia, Israel-Palestine etc) second. The new technologies section is premature & pretty speculative and maybe overly driven by Silicon Valley hype than have actually proven their importance especially at the decade level. 2601:642:4C00:6E0F:403A:CFFD:3D53:DC9E (talk) 00:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]