Jump to content

Talk:2024 Wayanad landslides

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article2024 Wayanad landslides was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 21, 2024Good article nomineeListed
August 22, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Launchballer talk 07:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[[File:|140px|The drone visual of the landslide origin near Punjirimattom ]]
The drone visual of the landslide origin near Punjirimattom
  • ... that more than 420 people were killed in 2024 Wayanad landslides in India, caused by 572 mm (22.5 in) downpour within just 48 hours, which was above monthly average 527 mm (20.7 in) in the area?
  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Chin pin choo (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Chin pin choo (talk) 12:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: The classic self-review. CMD (talk) 15:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As outlined at WT:GAN#Review needs looking at, there are significant issues with this article. The GA review lasted less than two hours. It did not check the sources as required by WP:GAN/I#R3, which might have picked up numerous issues of close paraphrasing/plagiarism. The article itself is riddled with grammar and spelling errors and poor prose; it also contains unnecessary details in many sections. It thus fails several of the GA criteria.
Pinging those who commented at WT:GAN: Thebiguglyalien, Chipmunkdavis, Chaotic Enby ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. Fails criteria 1a (many, many grammar errors), 1b (lead is way too short, also external links in body), 5 (very recent event, and the rescue operation is still current), and 6b (two galleries of dubious relevance). The long tables of individual donors also likely fail 1b (list incorporation) and 3b (unnecessary details). I can see a lot of other issues with the article (flag icons in prose, really?), but I am not sure whether those are actually GA requirements. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 11:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Article has been delisted to work on quality of the content. Chin pin choo (talk) 12:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've blocked the GAN nominator and reviewer, both as sockpuppets of Makks2010 based on behavioral evidence. DanCherek (talk) 15:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wetlands Discussion Focus

[edit]

Hi,Wet land is not safe for all including vegetations,wildlife and for residential and is worse disaster ever experienced over decades in around the continent of Asia and its surroundings cities and we can say is by nature but nature it turn it back to the innocent global citizens and hard land scarcity as other most parts of this continent is mountainous and very much expensive for the development of infrastructure eg:bridges,houses,roads,schools,churches,agriculture and rail+.We did and still prepared for any natural disasters as well as for human disasters and Net Zero is the only way and for all to adapt to before 2030-50 and work on this things now as fast as donors do and ready for any reported matters and issues happening on time to help and for donaters and charitabilities is a fat cake to claim to the taxman and the role they've played.Amooketsi SDG's and Paris Agreement is long-term and short-term projects to focus on now and forward looking to be all the best of the best and keep our promises to all and to ourselves to share and reach and score one goal for all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.114.142.4 (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sad demise of innocent Wayanad people

[edit]

The God's own country City has lost the most people it's very disappointing and I heard in you and I can't hold my Tears I burst out crying #SAVEWAY 115.99.180.96 (talk) 14:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]