Talk:Adie syndrome

Adie syndrome is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Medicine: Neurology / Ophthalmology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Ophthalmology task force.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Adie syndrome.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Symptom vs sign

In the discussion of Adies pupil, the article starts out by describing the three classic SYMPTOMS of pupil asymmetry, loss of deep tendon reflexes and diaphoresis. Asymmetry of the pupils and the loss of deep tendon reflexes are signs (physical findings) and not symptoms (what the patient feels). Diaphoresis (sweating) is a symptom and can also be a sign. 72.64.74.45 (talk) 23:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The source that describes these three uses symptom, so I think we ought to stick with that. Any of these three can be discovered by the patient (I first noticed that my pupils were dramatically uneven and thought I had a brain tumor or something. :-) ), so I don't think the source is technically incorrect either. --Danger (talk) 23:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

photo inappropriate

why have a photo showing two equally dilated pupils when the syndrome is generally one-sided? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.59.229 (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say exactly this! I'll try to find a better picture. Since it's a syndrome not limited to the pupils, it may not have to be limited to a picture of eyes. --M Killian (talk) 21:42, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]