Talk:Aletopelta
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
reference
[edit]Can one of the authors add a specific reference for the fossils recoverd from the Point Loma Formation to this article? The information given in the article on the Point Loma Formation is apparently incomplete based on this article but at least it is referenced. Jstuby (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- References have now been added.--MWAK (talk) 09:03, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Damaged bones.........
[edit]is it still a nomen dubium? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samweithe4 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- No idea, but a source like Arbour & Currie 2015 should bechecked. IJReid {{T - C - D - R}} 14:40, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
You mean it is no longer dubious? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samweithe4 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Taxonomy
[edit]Should the family Ankylosauridae be added under the classification table? On Ankylosauridae's page it shows that Aletopelta is a subgroup/genus of Ankkylosauridae, however this classification is missing for Aletopelta's page. Notyepeyton (talk) 21:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class dinosaurs articles
- Low-importance dinosaurs articles
- B-Class ankylosaurid articles
- Mid-importance ankylosaurid articles
- Ankylosauria Task Force articles
- WikiProject Dinosaurs articles
- B-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- B-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles