Talk:Ambedkar Jayanti

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India: Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Why some editors don't Understand the basic things?

The Introduction of this page goes like -

Ambedkar Jayanti or Bhim Jayanti is observed on 14 April to commemorate the memory of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, an Indian jurist, economist, social reformer and the principal architect of constitution of India.[1][2] The observance marks the birthday of Ambedkar, who was born on 14 April 1891.[3][4] His birthday is also referred to as 'Equality Day' by many in India.[5][6][7] In 2016, The Government of India declared 14 April as Rashtriya Samarasata Diwas to honor Ambedkar's legacy and contributions.

So here some people have probelms regarding the discriptions like Jurist, Economist or principal architect of constitution of India. but why ? Don't you know that ? I Even cited reliable references, people here don't read citations, they just revert it by saying baseless things. may be they are so biased towards their own limited knowledge.

Let me tell you why this introduction is perfectly okay and very very normal. There are many articles supporting the claim like Ambedkar was known as the principal architect of constitution of India. Here it is -

Reputable Websites

JOURNALS

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th

Govt officials

1st. 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Stategovt 1st 2nd

many books written on contribute him by title Chief architect of Indian Constitution by author like Eleanor Zelliot

Firstly please Read articles to Articles then come to any conclusion. Do you still think these all are articles, journals , even GOVT. Bodies and their author's are living in HOAX ?? Common buddies, make a valuable argument against all this. Nevertheless , if you still don't believe by these references and sources then bring some Journals or Reputable sites that make a conclusion that why ambedkar is not Chief architect of Indian constitution? or you should debunk all articles then it would be become a healthy conversation.

till then, Signing off

Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 20:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can also find many sources to claim that India is a 5000 year old country but still we won't accept it as a fact. Same way, your exceptionally misleading claims that were already addressed here cannot be added here. You must self-revert now and see WP:BRD. - Ratnahastin (talk) 02:06, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]