Talk:Barracks

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force

When were barracks first used in England / Britain?

One paragraph says not until 1790, because of fear of standing armies, and the next says one was purpose built in 1617. 86.178.150.109 (talk) 14:50, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tag for globalize

I am adding a Globalize/USA tag to the Worldwide section, because the United States told me to. P.S I love CHIPS!!! 72.151.39.230 (talk) 18:04, 9 June 2000 (CUT) 81.154.154.163 (talk) 16:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed computer games section

I removed the computer games section because nobody is going to care about this. If put back, please don't include pointless trivia about individual computer games as was contained in the text I removed. Here is what I took out: "Buildings called 'Barracks' feature prominently in many war-based computer games. For example, in Sid Meier's Civilization series, any units created at a city with a Barracks automatically gain 'veteran status', giving them a 50% attack and defense bonus. 'Barracks' are training structures in many RTS (real-time strategy) games. Generally, in such games, 'barracks' produce the most basic infantry units until further "upgrades" in technology are researched". --Xyzzyplugh 12:52, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural image

I think there is a certain image of militarism associated with barracks, e.g. that of quartering soldiers anywhere (an issue of the American Revolution), that should be discussed. John Riemann Soong 21:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Khubarracks

Removed:

==Khubarracks==

The Khubarracks are an elitist special tactical combat force barracks that are utilized in many military training regimes globally. Inspired by Lt.Col Khubaren who served in the Khatib Camp as a tactical special ops commando, all Khubarracks come equipped with the absolute state of the art military technologies to equip the soldiers of today with tomorrow's finest weaponry and research intelligence.^{[citation needed]}

...because it looks like a joke. Restore if it isn't. Leushenko (talk) 13:47, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barracks are military buildings not architecture

I've recast the definition because I think it should explain what barracks are and why they are built rather than just repeat the cliche about them being boring or repetitive designs. I dont have much information on continental Europe or US and more precise history and examples of both would improve the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrs Mei (talk • contribs) 00:39, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture is defined by many things. The mere fact that they are buildings qualify them as Architecture. SkonesMickLoud (talk) 07:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfamiliar term

The "U.S. Armed Forces" section says, ...these servicemembers are generally housed in individual rooms conforming to the DoD's "1+1 standard," though exceptions still exist. Could someone add an explanation of what this "1+1 standard" is? I would do it, but I have no idea what it means and can't find an explanation despite spending about 10 minutes searching with Google. cmadler (talk) 12:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barracks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013163723/http://remuseum.org.uk:80/rem_his_engineer.htm to http://www.remuseum.org.uk/rem_his_engineer.htm#mil_con

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]