Talk:Bees Saal Baad (1962 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bees Saal Baad (1962 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bees Saal Baad (1962 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120922021831/http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=168&catName=MTk2Mg%3D%3D to http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=168&catName=MTk2Mg%3D%3D

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 January 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved - consensus against (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 03:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– A simple Google Books search yields all the initial results to the more popular and rewarded 1962 film, clearly indicating that this is the primary topic and not the 1988 film. Oracle of Delhi 14:32, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious oppose per PageViews. --Gonnym (talk) 15:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as above--pageviews indicate the 1988 film is more frequently visited; google books suggest the 1962 film is more widely written about. As such it makes sense to keep the unadorned title as a disambig page to split the difference. GRAPPLE ^X 15:19, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Gonnym @Grapple X Was just wondering what about the other way around? Move the 1988 film to the title without the disambiguator, keep the 1962 film as it is and delete the disambiguation page. I have absolutely no issues with that. It just doesn't make much sense to me to keep a separate disambiguation page with only two pages listed when that purpose could be easily served by hatnotes. Oracle of Delhi 16:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that there's no clear primary topic; you could pick a metric to favour either one in that regard. Without a clear primary topic the current situation remains the cleanest solution. GRAPPLE ^X 16:33, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.