Talk:Bernard Stiegler

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bernard Stiegler article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Philosophers Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers

Universal Basic Income (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Universal Basic Income, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Universal Basic IncomeWikipedia:WikiProject Universal Basic IncomeTemplate:WikiProject Universal Basic IncomeUniversal Basic Income articles

Editors need to learn about ISBNs

A couple of misguided editors insist on including an invalid ISBN in the section "Bibliography / Books in French" for the item "(2013) Pharmacologie du Front national".

They prefer ISBN 2-0812-8461-6 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum. However, this ISBN causes a Checkwiki error #72 "ISBN-10 with wrong checksum", the original reason why I corrected the ISBN. Moreover, if these misguided editors would take the time to click on their erroneous ISBN in the article, they would see that Wiki responds with an error message "The given ISBN does not appear to be valid; check for errors copying from the original source". Finally, these misguided editors prefer an ISBN-10; such ISBNs have been superseded by ISBN-13.

I have done the necessary research to find the correct ISBN-13 for "(2013) Pharmacologie du Front national". Still, these misguided editors insist on reverting my change and calling for a discussion on the issue without ever writing a word in defense of their erroneous ISBN. In the meantime, I will continue to make the necessary editing changes to include the correct ISBN in the article.

Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 02:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should this sentence be re-added?

The lead section for a long time included the following:

“He has been called ‘the most important French theorist to come after Derrida, and one of the most important thinkers anywhere about the effects of digital technology’.”<ref>{{Cite book|url=http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/books/titles/the-neganthropocene/|title=The Neganthropocene|last=Stiegler|first=Bernard|date=2018|publisher=Open Humanites Press|isbn=978-1-78542-048-1|language=EN}}</ref>

I find it to be useful information, but User:Lovemankind83 removed it. Should it be re-added? His obituary in The Guardian certainly supports the view that he was an important thinker on the effects of digital technology, and he is also described in Los Angeles Review of Books as “one of the most influential European philosophers of the 21st century.” AndrewOne (talk) 23:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]