Jump to content

Talk:Bound for Glory (2006)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Konnan w/ LAX

[edit]

With it being a Six Sides of Steel, will it matter if he comes out with them? Will he come out at all?Freebird Jackson 04:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's with the picture

[edit]

I get the joke but there is no reason for it to be on this site, so if decide to take it off--The Sess 18:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle royale.

[edit]

Wasn't the official title the "Bound for Glory Kevin Nash Open-Invitational X-Division Gauntlet Battle Royale?" I think they kept throwing "Bound for Glory" in there just to make it as long as possible. And I laughed. VelvetKevorkian 09:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think they just wanted to make sure fans knew when it was. I think it may be the longest match name ever either way though, haha. TJ Spyke 22:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The longest match name ever was an FMW match I am pretty sure, Atsushi Onita and others (I forget who) and it was something like 'Texas Tornado Tag Barbed wire and bombed boards exploding ring land mines and fire Deathmatch' it was a great Deathmatch though whatever it was—Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.201.18.43 (talk • contribs)

Attendance

[edit]

The total attendance was 29000 , ticket sales boomed when the kevin nash open invitation battle royal was added to the card—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.161.95 (talk • contribs)

Uh-huh, this despite the fact that the Compuware Sports Arena has a maximum capacity of 4,500? TJ Spyke 00:37, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It held more that day, most people dont know that.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.161.95 (talk • contribs)
No it didn't, and sign your posts. TJ Spyke 05:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aparently this person who is afraid to sign his posts is too much of a coward to do so, anyways this person is wrong, I was in the arena at the event and past events, the exact same number of people every sold out show (about 4,500). --The Sess 23:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eric young and Bobby Rude Segments.

[edit]

Why were these not shown in the UK on The Wrestling Channel? One part of the show was actually shown twice (who the hell knows why) so was it during the second showing of the monsters ball match that it actually happened?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.201.18.43 (talk • contribs)

Bobby Roode competed on the half hour pre-show, not the PPV broadcast itself. As for the Young-Zbszko match (which is what i'm assuming you mean), you will have to ask The Wrestling Channel. Just be happy that you got it for free. TJ Spyke 02:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Da Gringo Killa

[edit]

It makes no sense to say "pinned after a Da Gringo Killa". That's like saying The Rock won a match with "a The Rock Bottom". It's just stupid. But apparently someone with bad grammar or just some kind of thinking deficit seems to think it should be "a Da Gringo Killa" to the point of changing it back to that.

Orphaned references in Bound for Glory (2006)

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Bound for Glory (2006)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "SlamBFG06":

  • From Christian (wrestler): Sokol, Chris (2006-10-23). "Sting new champ after Bound For Glory". SLAM! Sports: Wrestling. Canadian Online Explorer. Retrieved 2009-09-30.
  • From TNA Bound for Glory: Sokol, Chris (2006-10-23). "Sting new champ after Bound For Glory". Canadian Online Explorer. Retrieved 2009-07-02.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bound for Glory (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bound for Glory (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bound_for_Glory_(2006)&oldid=1198714513"