Talk:Bulimba Creek

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal Bulimba Creek is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Rivers Start‑class Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Restructure

The article needs to get similar thoughts grouped together and formed into coherent sections. -- Whpq 02:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Major rework completed today. Let's hope that addresses your concerns. Rangasyd (talk) 08:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for Western tributary, eastern tributary

—Park3r (talk) 19:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Park3r: Could you further clarify your request. I can see that the coordinates for the eastern and western sources of the creek may need to be adjusted a bit, but I'm unsure what exactly you have in mind. Could you specify what coordinates you think would be preferable, or at least what landmarks may be nearer those sources than the coordinates given in the article? Deor (talk) 01:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The primary source seems to be a rnadom point in the centre of Upper Mount Gravatt Park3r (talk) 04:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As near as I can tell from various Web sources, the headwaters of the creek are in Kuraby and Runcorn; but I can't really pin it down to exact locations, and Google Maps is little help with such urban streams that have been partly channelized underground. The coordinates in the article for the "primary source" look to be approximately the source of Mimosa Creek, which is a tributary of Bulimba Creek, but I can't tell whether it is considered the main headwater. In the absence of a definitive published source, I'm inclined to let stand what's in the article. At least we have the mouth coordinates right. Deor (talk) 14:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bulimba Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]