Jump to content

Talk:Capotain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

slightly conical?

[edit]

How can something be "slightly conical"? Maybe "nearly conical" or "somewhat conical" would be closer to what is meant? From the pictures, truncated cone seems a better description. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lriley47 (talkcontribs) 17:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sugarloaf

[edit]

In the article on the Top hat, the term "sugarloaf hat" redirects to this article — but "sugarloaf hat" is nowhere mentioned here. --87.112.89.202 (talk) 20:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Capotain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 September 2024

[edit]

Capotain → ? – "Capotain(e)" appears to be a ghost word created by Walter Scott. The closest thing that can be found in early modern sources is "copataine", which occurs once in Shakespeare. The more usual terms for this kind of headwear were "copintank" and "sugarloaf hat". I suggest using one or the other as the title of the article. Zacwill (talk) 03:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Google Books search shows a number of reference books using "capotain" to refer to the hat style. I think the article should use the title reflected in modern sources, and mention the terms that were used at the time. Schazjmd (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A number of terms are reflected in modern sources: copotain,[1][2] copintank,[1][2] sugarloaf,[3][4] high-crowned hat,[5] steeple-crowned hat,[6] and yes, capotain.[7] I notice that the latter underwent a massive increase in usage in the 21st century, perhaps because it was brought out of obscurity by this very article. Zacwill (talk) 15:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That ngram shows the rise in capotain starting a few years before the article was written, so I don't think we can blame ourselves. But ngram comparisons do show a slight edge to sugarloaf hat.[1] Schazjmd (talk) 15:59, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References