Talk:Centrosaurinae

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I like the cladogram but Ryan put Albertaceratops within Centrosaurinae, not as as sister-clade. So it should at least indicate the split with Chasmosaurinae to avoid ambiguity.--MWAK 07:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was my goof, so I adjusted it. J. Spencer 16:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--MWAK 09:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Whalepizza.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tribes

I'm having trouble finding authorities for the tribes within Centrosaurinae. TaxonSearch doesn't list either (though there is a Pachyrhinosaurinae). Mikko's site [1] lists Sampson 1995b for Pachyrhinosaurini but nothing for Centrosaurini. While the rule of coordination provides that these names do exist, we shouldn't use them here without something definite saying they have been used in print. Dinoguy2 06:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Pachyrhinosaurini" here is a self-redirect

The term Pachyrhinosaurini in this article currently redirects back to this article.

-- 186.221.135.235 (talk) 17:03, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should Lokiceratops rangiformis be added here?

Hi, not sure if it is the right place. T 84.208.65.62 (talk) 15:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]