Talk:Contact (1997 American film)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I have reviewed this article for GA. I copy edited the article for consistency, such as always calling the main character by her last name, and also corrected some MoS errors. Please feel free to correct any mistakes I have made. In my opinion, this article fulfills the criteria for GA. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): Yes b (MoS): Follows MoS
- a (prose): Yes b (MoS): Follows MoS
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): It is well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are reliable c (OR): There is no OR
- a (references): It is well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are reliable c (OR): There is no OR
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Covers the major aspects of the film b (focused): Remains focused on the article subject
- a (major aspects): Covers the major aspects of the film b (focused): Remains focused on the article subject
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Congratulations. An interesting article on an interesting film.
—Mattisse (Talk) 23:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing. Wildroot (talk) 02:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)