Talk:Equini

Equine Low‑importance

	Horses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Equini isn't extinct. Please fix it. Komodoboy16 20:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where does the article say that Equini is extinct?--Kevmin (talk) 20:24, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does say that Equini is "Prehistoric". Komodoboy16 20:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, no it doesn't. Here is the full one line entry for the tribe: "Equini is a tribe of herbivorous mammals of the subfamily Equinae, family Equidae, which lived worldwide (except Australia) from the Hemingfordian stage of the Early Miocene to present (20.6—0 mya) and in existence for approximately 20.6 million years." no mention of extinct or prehistoric. Are you looking at the fossil range bar in the taxobox?--Kevmin (talk) 21:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No. At the end it says that this article is an extint animal stub. Komodoboy16 21:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, not the wording is prehistoric mammal related stub, as the tribe includes extinct species that tag is valid.--Kevmin (talk) 22:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It includes Equus, which isn't extinct. Komodoboy16 15:46, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]