Talk:Flying Padre
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]From WP:RfD:
- Flying Padre → Stanley Kubrick -- seeing as the ONLY thing that links here is the Stanley Kubrick article and the unused template, the redirect is nonsenseWeebot 03:19, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Sigh. These used to be stubs about shorts by Kubrick, and got turned into redirs to his article. Since they are films by a very major film artist, I think having nothing under these names is inappropriate. We can either i) turn them back into stubs, or ii) remove the links to them in Stanley Kubrick, etc, and keep them as redirs; I don't have any particular preference for which we do. Noel (talk) 19:47, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Since these were only redirected by an anon, and they were perfectly reasonable stubs, reverting to those stubs is obviously the right course of action. sjorford #£@%&$?! 10:49, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Will do. Noel (talk) 01:39, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- Since these were only redirected by an anon, and they were perfectly reasonable stubs, reverting to those stubs is obviously the right course of action. sjorford #£@%&$?! 10:49, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Sigh. These used to be stubs about shorts by Kubrick, and got turned into redirs to his article. Since they are films by a very major film artist, I think having nothing under these names is inappropriate. We can either i) turn them back into stubs, or ii) remove the links to them in Stanley Kubrick, etc, and keep them as redirs; I don't have any particular preference for which we do. Noel (talk) 19:47, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
Added some content (there's not much to add, alas :-). Noel (talk) 19:28, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Merge
[edit]Perpetual stub Since Kubrick's short films were so short, their individual articles will inevitably be stubs. They should be merged into Short films of Stanley Kubrick. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 07:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think I agree, but let me see what happens if I try to flesh it out a bit - does it end up looking like an article, or at least a more respectable stub? I'll work on it for a while. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 03:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's a decent stub now, but I don't think it will ever be anything much more than a stub. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 04:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- The proposed merge article seems not to exist, so I've removed the merge tag. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Flying Padre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090712223447/http%3A//pages.prodigy.com/kubrick/kubbio.htm to http://pages.prodigy.com/kubrick/kubbio.htm
- Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090713001134/http://pages.prodigy.com/kubrick/kubfp.htm to http://pages.prodigy.com/kubrick/kubfp.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://pages.prodigy.com/kubrick/Stanley - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160414161152/http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kubrick.fr%2Fflyingpadre.htm&langpair=fr%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8 to http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kubrick.fr%2Fflyingpadre.htm&langpair=fr%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 15 December 2017 (UTC)