Talk:Forum Research
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Just curious what I can do to make this page more acceptable. I'm curious how it is different than say:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipsos
or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decima_Research
Forum Research was also featured here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_in_the_Canadian_federal_election,_2011
and their polls were covered nationally by National Post, Globe & Mail, Toronto Star.
Sorry - new to this. If you could point me in the right direction to bring it up to snuff it would be appreciated.
Added a link to polling results by the firm published in Wiki to support notability. There are several links to polls through google news but I'm not sure it would be helpful to add many of them to the page (or any of them). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tactleneck (talk • contribs) 18:20, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Added additional links to publications to support notability re: 2011 Canadian Federal Election — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tactleneck (talk • contribs) 19:28, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- I removed the speedy template and made some minor changes.Karl 334 ☞TALK to ME ☜ 21:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Stub-Class Toronto articles
- Low-importance Toronto articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- Stub-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles