Jump to content

Talk:Frederick Russell Burnham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleFrederick Russell Burnham is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleFrederick Russell Burnham has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 9, 2012.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 8, 2007Good article nomineeListed
September 29, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
July 12, 2012Featured article reviewDemoted
June 14, 2013Good article nomineeListed
September 25, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 11, 2018.
Current status: Former featured article, current good article


Mis-captioned picture

[edit]

On the third picture on the page the caption reads: "Burnham in Africa (middle) holding his Remington Model 1875 No. 3 Army in .44 WCF rifle". Now I am no expert, but AFAIK the "Remington Model 1875 Army" was a six-shooter pistol, not a rifle. I cannot tell from looking at the picture (and I doubt anybody can), but in "Burnham: King of Scouts" (end of chapter 7) it states that he set off from Durban (with Blanche and "The Kid") in 1893 (the date on the photograph) with an 1892 lever-action Winchester .44. --Mikepeat (talk) 14:50, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Woodcraft really not like Scoutcraft (Boy Scout Handbook 1911 & 2011 ed.)

[edit]

Both the book "Boy Scout Handbook" 1911 as the "Boy Scout Handbook" 2011 (one hundred years later) clearly differentiate between Scoutcraft and Woodcraft. But here in Wikipedia claim that the two terms are almost the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.137.188.105 (talk) 06:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Frederick Russell Burnham/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wehwalt (talk · contribs) 12:43, 9 June 2013 (UTC) I'll give this one a shot.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:43, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a long list of picky comments which goes beyond a GAN but I expect you plan to take it further so you might as well get it now.
Lede
  • I would omit "thus". I think it is implied. Also, soon after, I'd omit "only a"
  • I would pare down the list of engagements in the infobox. You might want to have someone from milhist look over this article.
Early life
  • Reservation should be lower case.
  • Does a one-year-old actually witness things? It should be made clear, I suspect, that the basket was not in the house when it was burned down. A barn?
  • The "died" at the end of the sentence for B's dad should be moved earlier in the sentence.
  • "baby brother". Younger brother. The "Burnham was only 12" might be more effective at the end of the paragraph. The reader is more likely to be impressed by his age in connection with his going solo than with respect to the death of his father.
  • As both Arizona and Oklahoma were territories then, I would refer to them as such "Arizona Territory", and link to the territorial articles.
  • "cattle and mining interests." Perhaps too vague "herding cattle and prospecting"?
  • The final paragraph of the section is a bit jarring. First it should be in the past tense. I would place that information somewhere within the section rather than ending with it. Perhaps when you discuss little brother going east with mom?
Milcareer
  • You might want to scatter a few (today in (country)) where appropriate.
That is, not everyone knows where these places are, you might want to put a (today in Zimbabwe) in where appropriate.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rhodesian histories in particular? Did he go out of fashion when Mugabe came in?
  • The exploits of most Rhodesian colonists did fall out of favor when Mugabe came in and the history of Zimbabwe continues to be re-written from a predominantly Shona perspective. Ctatkinson (talk) 01:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • " transport the copper through Mozambique" Since you use "copperbelt" immediately before this, perhaps "ore" or "metal".
  • can you not merge some of the short sections? A one paragraph one is too short to stand on its own in my view.
  • " Second Matabele War" I would use the term in the prose and then say Zimbabwe calls it a First War of Independence, or whatever it was.
  • The killing of Mlimo is a heck of a story! No longer PC, I fear.
  • A quote from Roosevelt's great tribute would be nice, if it's handy. I wonder if he met Meeker …
  • " while prospecting in Skagway, Alaska" quibble. He would be unlikely to be prospecting IN Skagway, which was a port where the trails into the Yukon started.
  • I think that the Second Boer War could do with a sentence or two capsule description of why they were fighting, and who the blip Lord Roberts was.
  • " given a commission by Lord Roberts" A quibble. Was it Roberts doing the commissioning? Or technically the Queen. You'll find our British reviewers can be very picky over the proper language in this situation.
  • Roberts made Burnham a captain at the start of the war. This was not a commission and I have changed the text accordingly. Later, the King did give Burnham a commission as a major and that is already well cited in the article. Ctatkinson (talk) 01:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some unsourced matter I'd like to see cleared up.
  • " looking for a critical choke point along the Pretoria-Delagoa Bay railway line" maybe "trying to identify the best choke point along the Pretoria-Delagoa Bay railway line" and move up the explanation of why he was doing this.
  • Did the Boers not pursue him, or did they not see the shot strike the horse?
  • Burnham states the following on pg. 343 of Scouting on Two Continents: When I believed myself a safe four hundred years for the Boers, I pulled Stembok [his horse] to a canter and straightened in the saddle. But some Boer scout had paid no attention to the British fire and kept pumping steadily at my dim, retreating pony, and even at this great distance, in the moonlight, he managed to send one bullet true. My last vision of my good Stembok was his silhouette against the sky, legs in air, directly over me. When I came to, the half moon was just setting, so I knew the time to be about two hours later". I have added context to the article accordingly. Ctatkinson (talk) 02:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "heroically" consider omitting. It speaks for itself. Something could be said about his no doubt fit for a hero reception in the UK? Also, why "Nevertheless," because he didn't win the VC? Few have.
  • In the image, you might want to say which is Burnham and which is Churchill.
  • I wonder if the scouting activities paragraphs (basically everything which follows the deGroot quote in that subsection) should be separated off and placed later, possibly titled == Scouting activities == or some such.
  • " lake of carbonate of soda in Tanzania." German East Africa.
  • "the Committee on Agriculture" House or Senate?
Not sure yet. Both the House and the Senate have a Committee on Agriculture. Tomorrow, I'll need to check the names of the congressmen present against the historical records and clarify.Ctatkinson (talk) 03:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
House. Now fixed. Ctatkinson (talk) 18:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "They had three children together, but only one survived into adulthood. In the early years, she watched over the children and the pack animals, always careful to keep a rifle within arms length." my first thought was "were two of the kids taken by hyenas?"
  • I think you should finish the life stories before talking about all his family members. So I'd put death first.
  • It's probably beyond the scope of the GAN, but you should at some point clean up that legacy section. It really reads trivially, and it's rather disjointed. Possibly call it "Tributes", but it needs to be more cohesive. A good case could be made in my opinion, that Burnham's legacy is Scouting.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now fixed. I believe we have adequately addressed the issues identified for the GAN review and I think the article reads much better with these changes. Let us know if anything further is needed and many thanks for your help. Ctatkinson (talk) 19:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seen, you're welcome. I'll look it over tonight.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Britt, Albert (1923). "Chapter 3. The Last of the Scouts". The Boys' own Book of Adventurers. New York: Macmillan.
This reference is not used. --  Gadget850 talk 13:30, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hippopotamus farming

[edit]

According to the "Forgotten English" calendar for 11 May 2016 (Compiled by Jeff Kacrick, published by Sellers Publishing Inc, 161 John Roberts Rd, South Portland, Maine 04106, www.makefun.com) Burnham was involved with Robert F. Broussard in a scheme to import and farm hippopotami from Africa to Louisiana. Evidently there was an "overgrowth of the invasive water hyacinth" and the idea was to clear the weeds and to raise meat for sale. Apparently he raised some money through "Bill HR23261". Quite an odd story, does anyone have any corroboration? Martin of Sheffield (talk) 16:14, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In June 2014, RatPac Entertainment and Class 5 Films acquired the non-fiction article American Hippopotamus, by Jon Mooallem, about the meat shortage in the U.S. in 1910 and the attempts made by Burnham, Duquesne and Congressman Robert Broussard to import hippopotamuses into the Louisiana bayous to clear the water hyacinth and to convince Americans to eat hippo. Edward Norton, William Migliore and Brett Ratner will produce this feature film. Cite: Fleming, Mike. "RatPac, Edward Norton’s Class 5 Options ‘American Hippopotamus’". Deadline Hollywood. http://deadline.com/2014/06/ratpac-entertainment-edward-nortons-class-5-options-american-hippopotamus-740913/ Ctatkinson (talk) 13:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frederick Russell Burnham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Link works and page seems relevant. Dhtwiki (talk) 23:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frederick Russell Burnham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Frederick Russell Burnham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:40, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frederick Russell Burnham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Mention of racism, imperialism, etc.

[edit]

where is the talk about his racism, imperialism, etc ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.56.224.34 (talk) 20:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As usual, it's a matter of finding reliable sources that give details on such qualities. Dhtwiki (talk) 22:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Frederick_Russell_Burnham&oldid=1195361995"