Talk:Gansu ultramarathon disaster

Gansu ultramarathon disaster was nominated as a Sports and recreation good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 6, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

A news item involving Gansu ultramarathon disaster was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 24 May 2021.

Wikipedia

China: History Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Low-importance).

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Running High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

Athletics High‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Thunderstorms / Tornadoes Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tornadoes portal This article is supported by WikiProject Severe weather (assessed as Mid-importance).

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in the following regions may be able to help:
China	Gansu

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Maps

A course map, and a locator map would be useful -- 67.70.27.180 (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done File:Gansu_Baiyin_Ultramarathon_2021.svg --Tomchen1989 (talk) 23:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The locator map (on a map of China, Gansu or the globe) would also be good -- 67.70.27.180 (talk) 03:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done File:Gansu ultramarathon disaster location en.svg --Tomchen1989 (talk) 20:50, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some resources

Some external resources that may have additional information:

[1] a web article with links to some interviews
[2] the event signup/rules site

— xaosflux ^Talk 17:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gansu ultramarathon disaster/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: RunningTiger123 (talk · contribs) 23:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this as part of the July 2021 GAN backlog drive. I'm aiming to have the article reviewed within the next few hours. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Listed below are the major issues with the article that I found. The relevant GA criteria are noted at the start.

1a: There are numerous issues with grammar; for example:
- "collapsed unconsciously from hypothermia" doesn't make sense
- "the two checkpoints are largely..." should be past tense
- "Some among the lead pack [...] and hypothermia" – this sentence is a fragment
- "yet that GPS message was never responded" doesn't make sense
- Inconsistent spacing around references and footnotes – there should be no space before the note and a space after it (i.e., "This is a sentence.^[1] This is another sentence."), but many notes use incorrect spacing ("This is a sentence. ^[1] This is another sentence." or "This is a sentence. ^[1] This is another sentence.")

This is by no means a comprehensive list of the grammatical issues. Due to the number of issues, I suggest that you consider a request for a copyedit from WP:GOCE.

1b: The lead fails to cover all elements of the article. Notably, there is no discussion of what led to the disaster and what the response to the disaster was.
2b: While not necessarily wrong, source 25 is from Xinhua, which may not be a great source for this topic (see WP:XINHUA).
2c: There are many side notes here that are original research. For example:
- Why is note 2 relevant? Is the definition of the karst discussed in any sources about the event? If not, it's not important.
- Same for note 3 – are the time zone distinctions relevant in any secondary sources?
- While the Yangtze river disaster is sourced, the source does not discuss that disaster in comparison to this one, so its inclusion violates WP:SYNTH.
- The Beaufort scale table is also irrelevant, as the cited source is not in reference to this disaster. You should link to the Beaufort scale article for readers who don't know what the different level mean, or better yet, include units such as mph or km/h that readers will more easily recognize.
- The "Similar incidents" section is entirely original research.
3b: Many of the side notes address in the previous bullet points cause the article to veer off topic instead of staying focused on this event.
6b: The caption "A color-adjusted Yellow River Stone Forest which does not reflect its true color" is unsourced, unnecessary commentary and should be removed. (Also, if the image isn't in true color, why was it included in the first place?)
Other notes:
- Duplicate wikilinks in the body are discourage – for instance, you don't have to wikilink trail running every time it appears.
- Similarly, the footnotes only need to be included once or twice. Too many footnotes can clutter the page.
- "甘肃晟景体育文化发展有限公司" should be translated to English.

Due to the number of issues with this article, particularly regarding grammar and original research, I feel I have no choice but to fail this article for the time being. But don't worry – there's a good article in here! With a little time, and some help from groups like WP:GOCE, I am confident this article can reach GA status. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:11, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]