This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christianliturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Celt and Saxon: Studies in the Early British Border. By NORA K. CHADWICK and others. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1963 p.302
"Many of the names of the principalities, cantrefs and commotes of Wales contained a personal name; and more were supposed to contain such than really did. These were clearly the names of historical characters, though often we know nothing about them. A favourite line of speculation was to make the eponyms of a group of these the sons of a famous ruler. The most famous, and perhaps the earliest of these legends, made the nine sons of Cunedda give their names to Ceredigion, Meirionydd, Edeyrnion and other districts in North and Central Wales.2 In a similar way, the opening of Lifris's Life gave Glywys ten sons, of whom nine gave their names to principalities or cantrefs, and married Gwynllyw to a daughter of the eponym of Brycheiniog. Brychan's twelve sons and twenty-four daughters were not mentioned by Lifris, and may be a later development.
This description of the family of Glywys undoubtedly enshrines early material. By the eleventh century the name Glywysing had been replaced by Morgannwg; and the kings of Morgannwg did not trace their ancestry from Glywys or any member of his family.3 This fact, which underlines the antiquity of some of Lifris's material, also casts grave doubts on whether Glywys was really the founder of a family remembered in early tradition at all. Like Cunedda, Glywys may well be historical; but his relationship to other eponyms was probably the product of later inference."
Dougweller (talk) 09:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]