Talk:Harmony (toolkit)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Relation to GNU

I found a mailing list thread from March 1999 with:

RMS saying "I thought that Harmony was part of the GNU Project." (not sure what he was replying to)

There are three replies:

Mark Menard says "looks like Harmony was a part of the GNU project"
Adam Richter says "nothing that I am doing is intended to stand in the way of Harmony copyrights being assigned to FSF"
Jo Dillon says "I'm happy to assign copyright of my code to the FSF"

For what it's worth. Gronky (talk) 11:52, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harmony (toolkit). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926234753/http://www.linuxbase.org/futures/ideas/issues/libqt/ to http://www.linuxbase.org/futures/ideas/issues/libqt/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]