Jump to content

Talk:Help Wanted (SpongeBob SquarePants)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages not moved Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 06:16, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


– The first episode of a worldwide phenomenon, versus four other titles of the same name (one of which doesn't even have an article any more), which, even when put together, are nowhere near as notable as this.

Wiki traffic views in June 2012

Overwhelmingly clear difference. Unreal7 (talk) 02:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC) Unreal7 (talk) 14:52, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Keep Help Wanted as a dab page - page views on Wikipedia alone are not enough to close the deal, at least for me. There would have to be overwhelming evidence that in the real world, people associate "Help Wanted" with an episode of SpongeBob. Note: I may be biased, because I don't know who or what SpongeBob is. First Light (talk) 05:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For one thing it's the best sourced of all the articles. And SpongeBob is 50 times as famous as any of the other four things. Anyone who disagrees has no idea what they're talking about. Unreal7 (talk) 16:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Help Wanted (SpongeBob SquarePants)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sportsguy17 (talk · contribs) 02:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article. I look forward to it and feel free to leave me a message about anything. Best, Sportsguy17 (talkcontribssign) 02:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Going over some basics: here is the Checklinks Report, and the Reflinks report. I will be posting a section-by-section analysis shortly. Sportsguy17 (talkcontribssign) 00:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I begin the section-by-section, I am going to advise you that a snowstorm (known as Nor'easters) is hitting Boston tonight throughout tomorrow and if I lose power, I will be unable to respond for a while. For time purposes, I am only going to mention sections that need improvement, especially regarding sources. If free will beats fate, then I'll check for mechanics (spelling & grammar) later once reference improvements are made.

That's just OK. I hope you'll be OK too. :) Mediran (tc) 03:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent job. I spent most of my morning shoveling snow off my driveway and walkway, albeit I still have power and so does everyone, so this is good . Anyway, good job. I verified the Plot summary references and no others need to be added. I will be checking all references and checking for spelling and grammar. This looks good so far. Sportsguy17 (talkcontribssign) 21:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Section-by-section Analysis

[edit]
Lead

The lead is looking pretty good overall. The first few sentences of the third paragraph need to be copy edited: For example, change it to The episode was written by Hillenburg, Derek Drymon, and Tim Hill and the animation director was Alan Smart. Otherwise, it seems to follow MOS:LEAD quite well.

Done. Mediran (tc) 03:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Plot summary

Although this section is about the plot, it could add sources in more details. If the given sources already support the details, use <ref name="..."/> for the duplicates and the original should be <ref name="...">(content of source)</ref> (without the tags of course )

Well, there is currently a source from the DVD. Is that OK or should I have to add more source/s? But I don't think there are other sources more reliable than what is presently written there. Mediran (tc) 03:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Read-through

This section is well-sourced, but is very short. Either combine it or expand it, since while its not necessarily a requirement per WP:WIAGA, it can be somewhat awkward to read a short section.

I have merged it to the "Release" section. Mediran (tc) 03:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I have for now. Lets start here. The article is looking well so far. Sportsguy17 (talkcontribssign) 01:39, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm looking forward to what this is going to be. Thanks again. :) Mediran (tc) 03:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Final review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality, no copyvios, spelling and grammar:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
Pass! Sportsguy17 (talkcontribssign) 00:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much Sportsguy17! :) Mediran (tc) 04:11, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Help Wanted (SpongeBob SquarePants)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

4 images, 48, citations. I don't think it passes WP:EPISODE. JJ98 (Talk) 03:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 03:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC). Substituted at 17:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Help Wanted (SpongeBob SquarePants). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Help Wanted (SpongeBob SquarePants). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Help Wanted (SpongeBob SquarePants). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the Help Wanted title card picture deleted?

[edit]

Why was the Help Wanted title card picture deleted? That's all I need to know. 107.146.244.150 (talk) 04:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two reasons: 1) it was a copyright violation, which we cannot host on Wikipedia for legal reasons, and 2) the deletion discussion for the image was uncontested. SkyWarrior 04:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that is true and I originally had it on my Draft:Schooled! article, until it was deleted on April 30, 2021. And the picture stayed in Wikipedia for many many years. 107.146.244.150 (talk) 04:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]