Talk:High-throughput screening

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the High-throughput screening article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Molecular Biology: MCB / COMPBIO

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Robotics Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Link spam

There is a concentrated effort by Zhang to reference all of his/her papers which are not even related (and def not important0 as a form of citation spam. 65.96.164.174 (talk) 17:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merge

I suggest merging high throughput biology into high-throughput screening. As far as I can tell from reading the articles themselves, there is almost total overlap between these fields, and the difference (if any) between these terms can be briefly clarified in a merged article. --DavidCary (talk) 15:02, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think they should stay separate on grounds that chemists and biologists would prefer them to be separate. I've been reading all of the HTS-related pages in preparation for my upcoming presentation at the American Chemical Society on HTS -- I need to clarify what counts as "biology" because the chemists do not want to hear about that! And in the reverse case, when presenting at BioIT conferences, the biologists don't want to hear about chemistry. Yes, these two topics are related -- but the biologists and the chemists WANT to think about them separately. --JesseAlanGordon (talk) 18:34, 20 March 2013 (UT

High-throughput screening in catalysis

I was wondering if it would be possible to start a new related topic or a sub-topic describing application of hts for catalysis (optionally divided into homogeneous and heterogenous one, further special fields of aplication like e.g. petrochemistry). From my point of view the current article is focused on biology and medicinal chemistry while achievements and technological solutions from the field of catalysis are not addressed at all. I would like to provide a contribution on this topic (size and number of citations to be discussed). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael Ludwik (talk • contribs) 19:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would like to support this comment and suggest to split chemical and biological high throughput screening. Chemicals refer to the high throughput catalysis as high throughput experimentation. However, i'm not sure how to create a new page. Anyone able to help? Hte gmbh (talk) 14:48, 11 July 2019 (UTC)^[1][reply]

References

^ https://www.wiley.com/en-us/High+Throughput+Screening+in+Chemical+Catalysis:+Technologies,+Strategies+and+Applications-p-9783527604302

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on High-throughput screening. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120728060615/http://www.yale.edu:80/htcb/ to http://www.yale.edu/htcb
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120208180112/http://www.biohts.com/ to http://www.biohts.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100620131951/http://www.aurorabiomed.com:80/icr_intro.htm to http://www.aurorabiomed.com/icr_intro.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.wiley.com/en-us/High+Throughput+Screening+in+Chemical+Catalysis:+Technologies,+Strategies+and+Applications-p-9783527604302

[1]