Talk:Humber Light Reconnaissance Car

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Humber Light Reconnaissance Car article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hummer precursor?

Cold this be where Hummer got its name, or more? Orthografer (talk) 04:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Humber LRC was NOT based on the Humber heavy 4x4 chassis. It was based on the Super Snipe car chassis. The Mk's 1 and 2 were 4x2 (the heavy 'box' was always a 4x4 as far as I'm aware) with only the later Mk3's having a 4x4 chassis - although the front suspension on the Mk3 does appear to be the same as the 'box' or, indeed the Humber Scout car. Of course the Box may be a 4x4 modification of the Super Snipe chassis itself. Anyone know? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.214.99.55 (talk) 21:00, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 November 2024

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

– Here "light reconnaissance car" is the generic type, and the first word is the proper name. The other/last two were added after BarrelProof's suggestion below. Dicklyon (talk) 23:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some data – The fact that "light reconnaissance car" is a generic type is evidenced by its use in many sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], and in particular with respect to the Humber: [5], [6], [7]. Per MOS:CAPS, then, we see that capitalization is not necessary. Dicklyon (talk) 23:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as usual and as previously advocated at Talk:Leyland Armoured Car. And let's not forget S1 Scout Car and C15TA Armoured Truck. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I forgot you had mentioned those two also at the other RM. I agree they should also move per similar reasoning. If you and Tony don't mind (and I'm sure you won't), I'll add them on before we get more responses here. Dicklyon (talk) 02:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support—next thing we'll be writing Humber Car. Tony (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]