Talk:Intermission (Hopper)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Viriditas (talk · contribs) 22:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: APK (talk · contribs) 04:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
It is a late period painting completed between March and April at his New York home and studio in Washington Square Park, in the Greenwich Village neighborhood of Lower Manhattan, New York City, four years before his death at age 84. - I think you can remove the first mention of New York since it's given later in the sentence. Lower Manhattan can be wikilinked. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

lifelong fan of the theater and the cinema - Remove "the" before "cinema" and add a comma after art teacher and Along with his wife. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hopper's wife, Josephine, - She is identified as his wife in the background section, so you can just say Josephine in the development and interpretation sections. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ébauche should be italicized. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kranzfelder believes Hopper uses this idea - used instead of uses APK hi :-) (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

châtelain should be italicized. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

both the Truro and Washington Square properties - What is Truro? APK hi :-) (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

along with images of four Hopper paintings, - Colon after paintings instead of a comma. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Guardian - Add wikilink. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

tableau vivant should be italicized. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
No issues. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
No issues. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
Please archive web references. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All quotes have inline citations. APK hi :-) (talk) 06:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ref #3 doesn't include the author's first name, Zuzanna. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spot check...
Ref #2 Y

Ref #5 Y

Ref #8 - AGF Y

Ref #10 Y

Ref #12 Y

Ref #18 Y

Ref #21, Y

C. It contains no original research:
No issues. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
No issues. Earwig shows the only similarities are quotes. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
Maybe add the measurement details in the description section. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
No issues. Focused and gives pertinent information. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
No issues. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
No issues. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
No issues. The fair-use image has proper licensing as do the public domain images. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
No issues. Relevant with proper captions. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
I only see minor things to address. Should be an easy fix. Thanks for working on this informative article. APK hi :-) (talk) 06:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]