Talk:Isolation to facilitate abuse

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 November 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

Religious Pseudoscience Claims

Regarding deletions made by Mr. Anonymous on 11/3/16 on the grounds that they were "religious pseudoscience":

Science is the ability to prove, via contextural analytical ability of the mind's absolute/terminal field, a conception formed by linear thinking of the conscious mind. What cannot be proven demonstrably is theorized analytically using the scope of knowledge and the conceptual ability of that particular person's conscious mind.

As this field of conception enlarges, so does the ability to rationalize. As fact which lies outside the absolute/terminal field then becomes apparent (a smoking gun), the ability to rationalize expands multinomially.

Thus, by applying abductive reasoning to this concept of science, pseudoscience means provable fact which lies outside the absolute/terminal field of the conscious mind, or lies outside the mind's ability to conceptually theorize the existence of such fact.

Pseudo comes from the Greek word ψεύδω, a theodical concept of deliberate, divine delusion (e.g., 2 Thess. 2:11 NKJV). Isobel Chaveh (talk) 20:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your personal understanding of science, disagreed. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Science is the study of proving knowledge (fact, truth) that already exists

"Science - a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths" http://www.dictionary.com/browse/science

Thus, logic dictates that knowledge (fact, truth) need not be proved by science in order to exist - Law of Non-Contradiction, Aristotle; Logic, the Discipline of Judgment, Law of Valid Inferences, Kant Isobel Chaveh (talk) 01:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong logic. Play of words. Has no relation to the way how wikiepdia handles pseudoscience. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article already exists under another heading

A more comprehensive discussion of this topic already exists in "Shunning and religion" (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shunning#in_religion)

If the content of this article cannot be merged with the latter, then the article should be tagged for deletion. Dr.khatmando (talk) 03:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shunning was already mentioned in Isolation to facilitate_abuse#Isolation itself as abuse or punishment as an example of isolation primarily as a punishment which is not the focus of this article. Yet you have narrowed it down even further by referencing Shunning#In religion. Other articles also relate to isolation as punishment eg silent treatment, ostracism, social rejection, social exclusion, blacklisting, solitary confinement and sensory deprivation so why just pick on shunning ?

Your existance on Wikipedia is suspicious - User talk:Dr.khatmando and your comment here seems to be designed to be provocative as it is completely irrational.--Penbat (talk) 09:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: CMN2160C