Talk:Jan Marcussen

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Seventh-day Adventist Church Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Notability

This article should not be deleted because the subject has been quoted as an authority on seventh-day versus first-day Sabbath observance and the advisability of blue laws.

There needs to be sources to back it up. ... discospinster _talk 16:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marcussen is mentioned on Historic Adventism. I do not believe he is notable enough for his own article, at least by the present sources supplied. Only one of the sources mentions him in any detail. I suggest this article be replaced by a redirect to to the historic article, and perhaps a line or two could be written about him there. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 01:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just searched Google Books, and found only one good reference to Marcussen (one book had a paragraph on him), and added it. Some more sources were added since I wrote my above comment. It may marginally scrape in to being notable, and because of the extra sources I take back my comment above. Could also try the SDAPI. It is important that the information come from reliable third-party sources, whereas most of it is currently unsourced. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 08:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Jackcrew, SDAPI stands for the Seventh-day Adventist Periodical Index. It is an index of many Adventist magazines, and extremely useful. Online here. I can't access it from this computer, so can't do the search myself. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 03:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hi, I just cleaned up this article's external links section in accordance with our guidelines and there were some reliable sources which didn't belong there but would be useful to someone interested in expanding the article. I'm listing them below for future reference.

[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=11265] WorldNetDaily article on the offer of a reward for proof of a scriptural change in Sabbath.
[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=10218] WorldNetDaily article on the controversial billboard warning of the antichrist.
[1] Catholic Herald article addressing concerns over Marcussen's campaign.

Them From Space 01:18, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_62#WORLD_NET_DAILY_final_answer_needed regarding World Net Daily as a source for interest. Sean.hoyland - talk 02:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

clean up

this thing reads like an ad, all the references barely have something to do with him. is there any real material out there about this guy? Bouket (talk) 18:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Very inadequate biographical and notability information provided in article. What’s there is limited to highlights that perhaps this individual’s followers want known. Bluepenciltime (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve added a few things to this article so that it somewhat reflects what is Marcussen’s notoriety without which there’s not any notability. Even with this, it’s questionable that he has sufficient notability. The article remains deficient as I’ve noted, especially the missing biographical info. What is under that section isn’t correctly categorized. Bluepenciltime (talk) 01:38, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have added and rearranged some info about his publishing. Still no biographical info available. Bluepenciltime (talk) 22:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]