Talk:JuJu Chan

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians / Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Martial arts Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's martial arts task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Cecilial14 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Icon Unlimited. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Disclosed as being the subject's PR manager at Wikimedia Commons here.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

JuJuLA.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

JuJu 2s.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Birthday discrepancy

Seems to be conflicting sources on her birthday; I've seen tags range from 1986 to 1989. Eastweek lists her as 1986. NextShark lists her as 1989. I'll add new sources when I can find them again but this is just to start the discussion as to whether or not we should include a date at all. BriefEdits (talk) 18:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at the Wikidata item to see all the reliable sources that I found about her birthday. --Martin Mystère (talk) 14:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Martin Mystère: I think it's interesting that the years vary so much even on user submitted websites like IMDB. I have reasons to believe that her the "real birth year" is actually older than the suggested 1986–1989 range (but research based on WP:SYNTHESIS isn't usable for Wikipedia). So given the assumption the subject is going out of her way to supply publications with varying birth years, then it'll probably be better to not have anything on the page per WP:DOB. (We could still do the birth day based on like a public social media post but that's hardly useful) — BriefEdits (talk) 19:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BriefEdits: I agree that it is better not to have a birth year in the article, because the subject and her PR team could always provide us a source that they like. On the Italian Wikipedia that's exactly what I did: I wrote that she was born on the 2nd of February of an unknown year and I explained in a footnote that according to the available sources it could be between 1986 and 1989. And I'll tell you more: I found an Apple Daily article about her birthday party in 2014 (dead, but luckily it has been archived) that explicitely says that "she stopped disclosing her age after she reached the age of 20" ("JuJu話過咗20歲之後，就唔再公開年齡"). Moreover, I looked at the archived pages of her official website and blog, but she wrote that her birthday was the 2nd of February or simply "private". Hence nobody can be sure about it because she is hiding this information on purpose, and there is a source that explain it. Maybe we should add a similar footnote here too, what do you think? --Martin Mystère (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Martin Mystère: Pardon my delay; I've completely forgotten about this talk thread. I am relatively indifferent about footnotes as I have never used them before. Feel free to be WP:BOLD and try it out. — BriefEdits (talk) 06:11, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BriefEdits: OK, I think that I am going to do it in order to prevent other users from adding her birth year without a really serious source. --Martin Mystère (talk) 09:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Feel free to modify it. --Martin Mystère (talk) 10:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]