Talk:Lenyadri

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Mid-importance).

Hinduism Mid‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lenyadri has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 1, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 8, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the prominent Hindu Ganesha cave temple at Lenyadri is located in vicinity of about 30 Buddhist caves?

Editing Notes

While copyediting I commented out a sentence that I couldn't understand and thought was too unclear to be left in the body as-is. Specifically, "Earlier idol as covered with armour obstruting its view, after its removal Girijatmaj's idol with neck turned to left side can be seen." If the original author would like to elaborate on what this means, either in the main article page or here in the discussion, hopefully we can find a way to put it in that's easily understandable to everyone. In the meantime it was not deleted, but made invisible. -- Kadin2048 00:40, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do not merge with Ashtavinayak

Article Lenyadri is not the same as the section Shri Girijatmaj under Ashtavinayak, since that article solely focuses only Ganesha related stories while the former is more inclinded towards the place lenyadri and history associated with it. Since Ganesha temple is the biggest attraction in Lenyadri the article will be dominated by information pertaining to it but slowly the article will get richer by local information edits (hopefully :)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kedar Borhade (talk • contribs) 00:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lenyadri/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 03:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! and I am a member of WikiProject Buddhism. I'll be reviewing this GA nomination. Should be done in a couple hours (or so). ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 03:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To begin, nice article. I am enjoying reviewing it. The prose needs a little polishing, but I'm doing that myself as I go, so don't worry about it. The first paragraph under "Cave 7" has a ^{[citation needed]} tag, because you need to put the reference directly after the quote. Please correct that. I'll continue to review it. ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 03:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the copyediting. Ref moved. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This line, under the chapels section: "Behind the relic-shrine, in a curve, are six eight-sided pillars." I'm not sure what you mean by "in a curve." If you can explain it to me here, I'll edit the article for you. Also, you use the term "corbelled" a couple times, and I don't know what that means. Can you explain that as well? Thanks. I'm almost done with the copyedit, by the way. ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 06:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope the new line helps. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In Cave 15, you say "unproved doorway." What does this mean? In Cave 16, you say "Cave 16 is a small dwelling, slightly higher above cave 15." When you say this, do you mean the ceiling was higher? Or do you mean cave 16 is above cave 15? If cave 16 is above, how is it reached? Stairs? A ladder? ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 07:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reference calls it "unproved". "The cell is 7' 11" broad 7 9" deep and 7 high with an unproved doorway 2' 7" wide and 6' 2" high.". The word can be dropped, if it is a problem as even I do not know the clear meaning. Reworded Cave 16 sentence. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the copyediting is done. It looks good. One thing I want to get your opinion on, before I make a decision: Do you think the detail about the ordinary numbered caves is necessary? I mean the ones that just have a bench and a cell, and stuff like that? Because I think the article would be just as strong if only the notable caves were described in detail. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 14:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:FA? wants comprehensiveness. If I remove that, comprehensiveness will be compromised. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Good work! ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 15:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lenyadri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091016101200/http://www.maharashtra.gov.in:80/pdf/gazeetter_reprint/Poona-III/places_j.html to http://www.maharashtra.gov.in/pdf/gazeetter_reprint/Poona-III/places_j.html#.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lenyadri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]