Talk:Liberty Meadows

Comics: Strips High‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Comic strips work group.
	This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance.

Untitled

Anyone heard of this, or done the Google testing? Is it Copy-vio? It sounds like the author's own promotional web page; should it be VfD'd or scrubbed with a stiff encyclopedic brush?
--Jerzy·t 23:10, 2005 August 2 (UTC)

I don't really see where this seems like a promotional web page to you and the part of this article I wrote (most of the lead section) is no Copy-vio. What exactly do you find unencyclopedic about it? --Fritz S. 09:11, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

I think i was mostly concerned about a fannish tone, but i'm more than happy to defer to those willing to do more work on it than i am. [smile]

--Jerzy·t 06:53, 2005 August 4 (UTC)

It looks thoroughly encyclopedic to me, and checks out as notable via Google: 90,900 hits for "Frank Cho", 161,000 for "Liberty Meadows". Tearlach 12:27, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship?

Some further information on why the strip was censored, and what the problem was with issue #27, would be welcome. 207.31.229.4 20:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it the censorship was only of the newspaper strips. The move from self-published to Image for the comic book was unrelated. (but I do not have any sources at hand fro this.) —MJBurrage • TALK • 22:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 16:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar is not Truman's pet

There was a story arc about Oscar going back to his owners thus breaking up our favorite dynamic duo. Brandy is either indefinitely pet-sitting Oscar, or owns him. Oscar is not Truman's pet. If I remembered the details, I’d correct the article. 12.216.46.140 (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and fixed it. Jerzy is correct; the article is "fannish." 12.216.46.140 (talk) 14:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Awards section

wouldn't this be more appropriately located in the artist's wikipedia entry, considering none of the awards listed here are specifically for "Liberty Meadows?" ShelbyMarion (talk) 22:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

C-Class rated for Comics Project

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 15:04, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Libertymedows.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Libertymedows.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:09, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liberty Meadows Gallery.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Liberty Meadows Gallery.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liberty Meadows. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131023120223/http://www.eagleawards.co.uk/category/previous-winners/2008/ to http://www.eagleawards.co.uk/category/previous-winners/2008/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liberty Meadows. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liberty Meadows. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306085010/http://www.scripps.com/foundation/programs/nja/previouswinners09-10.pdf to http://www.scripps.com/foundation/programs/nja/previouswinners09-10.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]