Talk:Linux Magazine

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Linux Mid‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Back Issues

It should be noted that the back issues of the magazine are only available to subscribers. I was not able to find any public links on the web site to let random people download any old/back issues. I would assume that is a feature that is only available to subscribers or they don't offer that to the public any more. Tjung (talk) 07:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

https://shop.linuxnewmedia.com/shop 24.124.63.106 (talk) 15:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

confusion

There is a bit of confusion. Linux-Magazin is the magazine in Deutsch language, but Linux Magazine in english is another magazine, by the same company, but another magazine. Linux Magazine in english by Linux New Media AG is called, also, Linux Magazine PRO in USA cause a Linux Magazine already exist in that country. In my opinion the article need to be reviewed and clarified, in the same way the Deutsch one. In my opinion could be made a "Linux-Magazin" voice in en.wikipedia.org with disambiguos for English language that land to "Linux Magazine"; in this "Linux Magazine" article we could also talk about the USA-Linux Magazine or put another disambiguos discalimer. --Fabrizio.ciacchi 22:34, 24 feb 2006 (CET)

Is ok if I will adopt this structure across the it.wiki en.wiki e de.wiki?

On Deutsch Linux-Magazin will "link to" or disambiguos to Linux Magazine
On English Linux Magazine will explain only Linux Magazine USA with a disambigous to Linux_Magazine_International that "link to" Linux-Magazin and has also a Linux_Magazine_Pro redirect.
On Italian Linux Magazine refers to italian magazine and already contains a disambigous to Linux_Magazine_(inglese). My guess is to make an article Linux_Magazine_Internationl that redirects to Linux_Magazine_(inglese) and a new article about Linux-Magazin.

Seems hard and difficult, but I think is the best solution. --Fabrizio.ciacchi 00:59, 25 feb 2006 (CET)

LiNUX+

Anyone pls kindly create this article based on the following

http://www.lpmagazine.org/ --222.64.24.108 (talk) 09:10, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now that link redirects to http://sdjournal.org/ (Software Developer's Journal, which was recently deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software Developer's Journal). Linux+ is a CompTIA certification exam. Thus, I'm deleting the link from this article's see also section. – Wbm1058 (talk) 14:40, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Linux Magazine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.linux-magazin.ro/Revista/Arhiva

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyberpower678: – What's the procedure for "sourcecheck failed"? Do you want to check these to see whether failure is due to a bug in your program? Should these be categorized for manual archive site searching by humans? wbm1058 (talk) 15:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Linux Magazine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130802084553/http://www.linux-magazine.com.br/ to http://www.linux-magazine.com.br/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]