Talk:Living in the Past (album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Living in the Past (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:29, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancies between tracklisting on the US album versions

I have removed this part of the article because it seems to be something based only on some pressings who, apparently, mistakenly may have used the UK artwork. Most of the US versions seem to have the correct tracklisting both on the label and on the booklet (there are no song titles pressed on the back cover). However, in case it's needed, I'm saving the removed part of the article here:

A few discrepancies between the tracks listed on the back cover of the U.S. album version and the tracks listed on the label on the vinyl are:

• Side 2 -- spelled "Witch's Promise" on the label, the song is spelled "Witches Promise" on the back cover of the album.

• Side 2 -- song 3 on the label is listed as "Teacher", followed by song 4 "Witch's Promise", whereas the songs listed for Side 2 on the back of the album cover show song 3 as "Witches Promise" (sic), followed by song 4 "Teacher". The correct order for the US version of the album is the one listed on the label.

• Side 2 -- song 5 on the back of the album cover is listed as "Inside", whereas song 5 on the label is listed as "Alive And Well And Living In".

• Side 4 -- spelled "For Later" on the back cover of the album, the song is spelled "From Later" on the label.

Zappafripp (talk) 21:22, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For Later vs From Later

I have the vinyl album that I purchased in 1972 in the U.S.. Songs are listed on the record labels, and twice in the included book (once referring to record sides, and then again at the end with recording info). Side 4 track 6 is listed as "From Later" in all three places, not "For Later".71.88.54.67 (talk) 19:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about the back cover? (see immediately preceding thread) The CD seems to use "For Later": [1]. I'm not sure why they would stick with something that was incorrect for a later CD issue? Maybe the discrepancy is worth a footnote in the article. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Carelessness abounds these days - this was nothing more than a mistake. Artists and/or dedicated producers making 'special editions' take care that this sort of blunder doesn't happen.50.111.58.135 (talk) 03:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]