Talk:Monkeys in Chinese culture

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Primates Mid‑importance

	Primates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cuisine

I am very skeptical of the claim that Chinese (or any people) traditionally ate monkey brains, especially the notion of eating live monkey's brains. I've noticed both here and in the Wikipedia article about "Monkey brains" someone cites as evidence for this practice in Han Dynasty China an article by religious professor Holly Gayley. That article relies on writings of a contemporary Tibetan monk, Tsultrim Lodrö, published in his book Timely Advice (2004). I can't access that book, but one would have to know the author's sources to evaluate that assertion. Anti-Chinese propaganda is not unknown among Tibetans (for obvious reasons).11 Arlington (talk) 22:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

If this article is going to be about macaques and gibbons, the article should be titled "Primates in Chinese culture". Also, I'm surprised there's no mention of the slow loris. – Maky ^« talk » 16:49, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In regard macaques and gibbons, it's true that the word "monkey" is vague in English, in terms of primate taxonomy. Life science sources tend to prefer specialized nomenclature, for good reason. One of the problems with "Primates in Chinese culture" is that this would then extend the topic area to include the well-known primate Homo sapiens. What a mess! Anyway, "Primates in Chinese culture" good idea for redirect page. Dcattell (talk) 18:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, "Non-human primates in Chinese culture" would be a better name. "Non-human primates" is a commonly used term in anthropology. – Maky ^« talk » 03:57, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Slow loris range does extend into China, per article. A poisonous primate! Very interesting.... Reference suggestions? Dcattell (talk) 18:09, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Maky and Dcattell for the suggestions and redirect. Yes, you are correct that we should include the lanhou 懶猴 ("lazy/sluggish monkey") "slow loris", and I'll check some Chinese references. Keahapana (talk) 23:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monkeys in Chinese culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081217022947/http://www.gibbonconservation.org//07_journal/gibbon_journal_4.pdf to http://www.gibbonconservation.org//07_journal/gibbon_journal_4.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:31, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]