Talk:My Family series 1

BBC: Sitcoms Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by BBC Sitcoms Task Force.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: British / Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Why?

This does not warrant an article. All episode info is at the episode list, some info is trivia (bedroom info for example), info regarding ratings etc should be merged with a decent section at main article on the programme reviews etc. This article is superflous and should be merged.--UpDown (talk) 19:07, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, this article is warranted due to the shows long history. With a ninth series in production, it makes sense to sort it all out by series. The episode section in this article is much better than the one on the main My Family page anyway, however it may need expanding. Anyway, surely a show with 100+ episodes (after series 9) deserves to have its series better organised. 90.192.200.228 (talk) 19:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With the exception of viewing figures, the episode tables are exactly the same! Just because a show has a long history, that does not mean it needs series by series pages for the sake it, and I don't see in what way its "better organised" to have the same information repeated twice! It is better organised to have all episodes listed on one article.They're should only be series articles if they is a good section on production and reception for that series. This article has a minor section of viewing figures, that could go to main article. The "Critics" section is not specific to this series, so should not be here. Unless this article drastically improves I will merge with episode list/main article.--UpDown (talk) 07:08, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be better to discuss the matter first, rather than just jumping in to do what you want. Since you seem to know so much about My Family, could you provide a section about production? However, I do agree that the synopsis for each episode could be improved. 90.192.200.223 (talk) 16:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hence why I have started a discussion thank you very much. But if no improvement is made within a reasonal space of time then I will merge. I do not have the given information to provide a good section on production (I wish I did), and I do not believe each series needs its own page anyway. The plots need minor expansion, but not much more than that.--UpDown (talk) 16:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Production Section

I have added a small section on production, with the info I have at hand. I am looking for more relevant stuff (such as filming dates) and will add it when I find it. Mpvide65 (talk) 18:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Filming dates would be good. Otherwise, the current production section is, again, just general info on My Family production not this series. As the article stands it needs merging.--UpDown (talk) 06:54, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Episode Info

I think that if the episode synopses are written to a reasonable length (explaining most of the plot) and not just a few lines, then this page can stay. Otherwise the List of My Family episodes article could become extremely lengthy, especially with 100+ episodes (after series 9). As for filming dates, I have no idea where to get them, but am I am looking. Mpvide65 (talk) 18:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You must remember not to make them too long. For insistence, I think the perfect length is as seen here: List of Terry and June episodes. I think with the current number of episodes, this would be fine on the main page. Even with longer plot summaries, there is little cause for a seperate page as yet. If the programme goes on as long as Last of the Summer Wine, fine, but not yet.--UpDown (talk) 19:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point, however, I must point out three things. The summaries on the Terry and June page are already longer than the My Family ones. Secondly, only two and a half series of Terry and June episodes have been written up and third, that article is fairly long already. When the rest are written up (quite a lot to do!) it will be even longer. Besides, Terry and June lasted (only) 65 episodes so if written to that standard, the My Family page will be huge. So I still think the separate articles for each page are necessary, that way the plots can be expanded. Mpvide65 (talk) 20:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know the plots for Terry and June are longer, that's how long I think all episode summaries should be. The page will not be that long when completed, certainly not longer than is acceptable. Neither will the My Family episode list be "huge", look at other episode lists like Friends. Articles can be that long. If it was decided to split series by series the whole page would be need to be reorganised, like the Last of the Summer Wine episode list. We cannot have repeated plot summaries at two articles. Also, this article if it stays does need a serious tidy. For a start, all general My Family info should be removed - thats what the main article is there for.--UpDown (talk) 07:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The general info can go but the section covering differences with other series can stay, providing references are given. Anyway, the List of My Family episodes page cannot be reorganised until every series is written up, which will take a while. Mpvide65 (talk) 16:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only if the differences are not trivial, which frankly they are. I do not believe this page can stand on its on, and would be far better as one page.--UpDown (talk) 16:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just looking at the Last of the Summer Wine series pages and I saw that they contain no production details of any kind. As I've said if you allow me to expand the plots to a suitable length (more than two or three lines like the ones at Last of the Summer Wine (series 1)), then I'm sure the page can stay. Mpvide65 (talk) 16:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last of the Summer Wine has seperate due to the huge number of episodes, My Family nowhere near matches this. As I've said, all plot summaries, I think, should be the length of those at Terry and June, and in fact S8 of My Family.--UpDown (talk) 17:08, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is my personal opinion that having separate articles on different series means the episode summaries can be made longer i.e not just a quick explanation. I know Last of the Summer Wine has 275 episodes (something like that) compared to My Family's 90, but 90 is still a lot and I think the separate series articles are a good idea. Mpvide65 (talk) 17:21, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image on this page may be deleted

This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:51E2NRQPM3L SL500 AA240 .jpg, found on My Family (series 1), has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI (talk) 23:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on My Family (series 1). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]