Talk:NGC 2997
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg?lang=en){kind=small}
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on NGC 2997. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070420125120/http://press.princeton.edu/titles/2537.html to http://press.princeton.edu/titles/2537.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Picture orientation and distance
[edit]According to several other websites that I've checked, there are two things "wrong" with this article.
First, the photo's orientation. It needs a vertical (top/bottom) flip since "north" is almost always at the top' not at the bottom. In fact, all the websites I checked had the photo flipped with the bright spot in the upper right corner actually being in the lower right corner. That's because most sites identify the bright spot as a rising Moon - - - and I've never known the Moon to rise from the upper part of the sky.
Second, those same sites give the distance of the galaxy at 140 million light years; not the 25 mentioned in the lede nor the 39.8 in the Infobox. And even if the "140" is not correct, why is there any difference between the numbers in the lede and the Infobox?
Can anyone verify these two items and make the necessary corrections in the article?
Just curious. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 01:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)