This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Nature-positive (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 29 October 2024 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
A fact from Nature-positive appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 August 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that more than 90 world leaders have made a pledge to achieve nature-positive goals?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that over 90 world leaders have commited to the Leaders' Pledge for Nature; to nature-positive policies, reversing biodiversity loss and full nature recovery by 2050?
Overall: Interesting topic and extensive article, earwig picks up some phrases but these are just long names for government departments and names of agreements. I slightly copyedited hook for length, its a bit long but within WP:DYKTRIM rules. QPQ not needed —John Cummings (talk) 21:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Addition of "Controversy" section and expansion of "in practice" section
Hello Wikipedians,
I have added a controversy section to address the debate that has emerged around the nature-positive goal. I have also expanded the "in practice" section to include information on policies in Australia, the EU, Japan, the United Kingdom, and United Nations. I have plans to expand this section further to gain a more representative global view and to add to the "Approaches" section. If you have any suggestions/questions after my edit please let me know!
Manxshearwater (talk) 08:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've just moved things around a little so that it's easier to find where things are. Also the "in practice" section would have become way too long. Please remember there should be no external links (as hyperlinks) in the main text. Please remove them e.g. by converting them into references. EMsmile (talk) 10:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting topic and extensive article, earwig picks up some phrases but these are just long names for government departments and names of agreements. I slightly copyedited hook for length, its a bit long but within WP:DYKTRIM rules. QPQ not needed —John Cummings (talk) 21:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)