Talk:Paulina Luisi

Paulina Luisi is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by Spookyaki (talk) at 23:42, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Short description: Argentine-born Uruguayan doctor and feminist

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Feminism

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Argentina Low‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentine history. If you would like to participate, you can improve Paulina Luisi, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Uruguay Mid‑importance

	Uruguay portal This article is part of WikiProject Uruguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Uruguay. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.UruguayWikipedia:WikiProject UruguayTemplate:WikiProject UruguayUruguay articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Green: Around the World in 31 Days

This article was created or improved during the Around the World in 31 Days GA edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Green project in October 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in GreenWikipedia:WikiProject Women in GreenTemplate:WikiProject Women in GreenWomen in Green articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paulina Luisi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070715020747/http://www.correo.com.uy/filatelia/frames/MujeresDestacadas_ingles.htm to http://www.correo.com.uy/filatelia/frames/MujeresDestacadas_ingles.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

==Wiki Education assignment: HIST 280z== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2022 and 20 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gemagnes, Adh08 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: SarahO95.

New changes to Paulina Luisi

We are students in a wiki Ed class that will be adding information to her involvement in the League of Nations, her work in Uruguay, and sex trafficking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gemagnes (talk • contribs) 23:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

student wiki project

We have finished our research for the article and will transfer it out of our sandbox. We deleted repeated information that was creating confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gemagnes (talk • contribs) 23:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gemagnes/Paulina_Luisi?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gemagnes (talk • contribs) 23:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Planned Improvements (Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon)

Hi all! I will be working on improving this article as part of the Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon in the upcoming days and weeks. Based on a preliminary look at this article, here are some major things I would like to accomplish:

Verify all of the sources used. Not all of the claims made are supported by their appended citations. Ideally, I would like to either (a) find evidence for the claim elsewhere in the source or (b) find evidence for the claim in another source. However, if I can do neither, I will (c) delete the unsourced claims.
Consolidate sources. There are a lot of repeated full citations that I would like to consolidate into shorter citations.
Copyedit, as necessary.

I'll be working in my sandbox primarily, and transferring edits as appropriate. If you have any questions, suggestions, or objections, please let me know! I am a new editor, so I might make mistakes. Please let me know if I do. Thanks! Spookyaki (talk) 22:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will also try to rearrange the article per MOS:CHRONOLOGICAL. This may mean that edits will have to come in all at once. I apologize for any inconvenience. Spookyaki (talk) 00:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so I ended up doing a lot of edits. Here’s a quick summary:

I reorganized the article so that it is more chronological in structure, rather than being a random assortment of ideas. The lead for the “Medical education and teaching” section went to “Early life and education.” The “Sex-health education” section was split between “Early activism” and “Later activism.” “Feminist influences” was split between “Views,” “Early life and education,” and “Early activism.” “Uruguayan feminism” mostly wound up in “Early activism.” “Pan-American feminism” was split between “Death and legacy” and “Views.” “Radio femenina” went under “Later activism.” “League of Nations work on sex trafficking” remained its own section under “Activism and career.”
A lot of information in the article either misrepresented the source documents, was plagiarized from the source documents, or was otherwise not supported by them. A lot of info ended up getting cut when I could not find any other documentation to support it (which I did try to do).
I added a “Death and legacy” section to close things off. There isn’t a lot of information on Luisi’s death, so the section is pretty short.
I reorganized the citations into “References” and “Sources and further reading” sections. A lot of full citations were consolidated into short citations.
A lot of wording ended up getting changed, sometimes for copyediting reasons, and sometimes because of plagiarism.

Now that I’ve reorganized the article and am more familiar with the source material, I would like to extend the article in a few ways before I submit it for GA status. Specifically, I would like to provide more information on (a) Luisi’s activity during the 1920s, which is under-discussed, and (b) her antifascist activism.

Again, let me know if you have any questions, suggestions, or objections!

Spookyaki (talk) 02:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Green 20-min assessment

Lead: should be about two or three times the size, imo. Try to summarize the most important parts of the article. Imagine a reader who only reads the lead, and hit all the key parts.
Images: good.
Citation style: not a GA requirement, but your reviewer will appreciate it if you convert these hand-written short footnotes to use Template:sfn instead (so that they link directly to the sources in the bibilography).
Sources:

For the two books by Luisi, can you link to an archive.org copy? Or at least provide more of the citation? Who published these?
fn 17: what the heck is happening here
everything else looks good, though I haven't done any spot-checks for verification.

Prose:

"worked as educators" - meaning, teachers? Or something else? "educators" is weirdly vague.
"As more women joined the medical field, however, the number of female physicians started to rise." Well, yes, obviously.
"viewing it as a degrading "social evil."" citation needed here, for the quote.
"The White Slave Trade and the Problem of Reglementation." - is that really what it's called in English? not "regulation"?
"on air" - you use this phrase twice in two sentences, swap one for something else

Looks great. Submit it. -- asilvering (talk) 21:59, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recommendations! Weirdly enough, reglamentation is the term that's used in most English sources as well, though I do seem to have misspelled it, since it wasn't a term I was familiar with before working on this article. It seems to refer to a very specific set of policies. Per the Hispanic American Historical Review:

Reglamentation—as opposed to repression, in which sexual commerce was illegal, or abolition, in which it was deregulated, in effect neither legal nor illegal—required that women who regularly had sexual relations with more than one man have their photographs taken, give their names and addresses to sanitary authorities, and undergo periodic gynecological examinations to check for signs of syphilis or other contagious genital afflictions. Women were registered as either en comunidad, which meant that they worked in a brothel, or as aisladas, which meant that they worked alone. Depending on the location of the brothel or the aislada's apartment, women were categorized in one of four classes. Those who wished to operate brothels as matronas did so by licensing their houses with municipal authorities. Women who failed to register with authorities but who nevertheless had sexual relations with several men were considered to be illicit prostitutes and were known as clandestinas.

Spookyaki (talk) 23:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I think a note about this somewhere in the article would be helpful. Or perhaps you could spin up a new stub for it? -- asilvering (talk) 00:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]