Talk:Petticoat Lane Market

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Transport Low‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jews arrrive in 1880s

Excellent article. Thank you! I just stumbled on an 1815 book http://books.google.com/books?id=_CdJAAAAMAAJ called, (ugly cut and paste): THE BEAUTIES of England and Wales OR, DELINEAT1ONS, TOPOORAPHtCAL, HtSTORtCAL, AXD DESCRtPTtVE, OF EACH COUNTY EMBELLISHED WITH ENGRAVtNGS. RT THE REV. JOSEPH NIGHTINGALE. VOL. X. Part III.

Around Page 151 is a description of Petticoat Lane. It seems in every other sentence is expressed dismay of how the place had gone to the Jews. Perhaps the sentence in the wikipedia article could be revised to say that the 1880s immigration was an extension of an earlier migration or whatever turns out to be the case.

Thanks again to all who have put this together. (fotoguzzi) 131.252.210.82 (talk) 12:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

err.. can wikipedia please explain how this comment 2nd passage in was accepted: The name Petticoat Lane came from not only the sale of petticoats but from the fable that "they would steal your petticoat at one end of the market and sell it back to you at the other" Up to the end of the war it was mostly Jewish since then very Indian and "boat people".

the last sentence is a touch racist no??? - Harry Jan 2014

East London, East Central London, or where?

Hi. I'm a little confused as to where Petticoat Lane should be described as being - "East London", or "East Central London". It is possible to build consensus on how we think this should be described, please? Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 16:12, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

East Central because A it is inside the Congestion Charging Zone and B because it is in Travelcard Zone 1 not 2! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justgravy (talk • contribs) 19:39, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would say Central London, without the East business. Simply south...... eating shoes for just 6 years 21:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Kill The Extremist!!!~~ Ahem ... I mean, er, interesting food for thought. Not what I was expecting at all. goes off to think. Hmmm. DBaK (talk) 22:17, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So are we agreed, change it to Central?! Justgravy (talk) 16:53, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, I don't agree. I think it should be East London or the East End as it previously was. I think that Central is a mistake, and East Central isn't something I am yet convinced is commonly said. I was hoping for a consensus among more than three editors and I think it may be a bit early to close this. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 17:04, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry DBaK but its 2 against 1, either you find someone who agrees with you, or it gets changed to Central tomorrow, and any edit warring will be reported to an admin. Justgravy (talk) 23:31, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This threat: "any edit warring will be reported to an admin" was wholly uncalled for. DBaK (talk) 09:59, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have mentioned this issue here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject London#Parts of London relocated. I am dropping you a courtesy note on your talk page - please feel free to remove it. It's only in case you miss it here. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 08:07, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note I am issuing Justgravy a warning on his talk page about this. — Hex (❝?!❞) 09:00, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why all the men?

As this video points out, Petticoat Lane attracted a lot of male customers back in the 20's. You can see the same in the photos on this page. Does anyone know why? FOARP (talk) 07:46, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Petticoat Lane Market. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060613211200/http://eastlondonhistory.com/petticoat%20lane.htm to http://www.eastlondonhistory.com/petticoat%20lane.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]