Talk:Plug & Pray

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Film: Documentary / German

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.

Futures studies Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Robotics attention needed

Expand if possible
Check citations
Reassess and add importance

Chaosdruid (talk) 13:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Style

Um, this is written like it was someone plugging a documentary

"Eloquent and tactful, he questions the prevailing discourses on new technologies, and their ethical relationships to human life. "

Yeah, what does "Eloquent and tactful" add to that sentence, or article, in terms of content? That isn't even a cited quote from a reviewer or anything. Also, all 5 citations are just about when and where it screened and the awards it won. I understand a synopsis doesn't need a citation every 6 words, but if you're going make an article to jerk off the people involved with this film, at least try to get half of statements backed up facts and only use the flowery bullshit for the more inherently subjective sections of an article like reception. -- 96.30.141.139 (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw and changed some of that text before reading your comment. I agree completely, and welcome additional edits. --tgeller (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]