Talk:Post–World War I recession

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Post–World War I recession article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	World War I task force

It is requested that an image or photograph of Post–World War I recession be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This is clearly an article written as nothing other than an Austrian opinion piece. There are no real sources, and if someone does put someone up I assure you they will all come from the Mises institute. Is there anyone with some real information on this recession who doesn't feel the need to use it as nothing other than a method to justify their belief the the Great Depression was caused by teh socialisms, and that recessions can be fixed by doing nothing?74.251.36.170 (talk) 16:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UK

Apparently UK GDP reduced 10.9% in 1919 then 6.0% 1920 8.1% 1921 which seems more than 'moderate'. Need a good source. - Rod57 (talk) 15:07, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: withdrawn by nominator. Paintspot Infez (talk) 20:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC) Paintspot Infez (talk) 20:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Post–World War I recession → Post-World War I recession – Moved by HueMan1 and previously Hmains to "Post–" (note the dash). But this is not the correct usage of dashes in English: there is no noun "Post" being joined to "World War I". Instead, "post" is being used as a prefix, which in English is hyphenated. See MOS:HYPHEN. (Pinging Litesand, who previously made a similar request.) Wikiacc (¶) 02:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC) Withdrawn. Wikiacc (¶) 17:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Wikiacc: Please read MOS:PREFIXDASH. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 02:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per MOS:PREFIXDASH. — BarrelProof (talk) 02:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (strongly), per MOS:PREFIXDASH. (I'd totally recommend giving MOS:DASH a read.) Paintspot Infez (talk) 03:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral: I advise using an entirely non-dash format, per MOS:PREFIXDASH (as mentioned above).
There exists examples of hyphenation used for this purpose, e.g. article Part-of-speech tagging. En dashes are ~~typically only~~ used in article titles when spanning a date range. ~~I have not seen an article title formatted as Post(en dash)subject.~~ — Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 04:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DeNoel: See: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:PrefixIndex&prefix=Post%E2%80%93&namespace=0. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 07:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Per MOS:PREFIXDASH: Instead of a hyphen, when applying a prefix or suffix to a compound that includes a space or a dash examples pre–World War II aircraft (consider recasting: aircraft from before World War II), post–September 11 anti-war movement. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikiacc, BarrelProof, Paintspot, DeNoel, and Rreagan007: I invite you to give some of your opinions at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Post–World War II or Post-World War II?—which is somewhat related to this RM, thanks. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 08:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw. Thanks all for pointing me directly to MOS:PREFIXDASH, which I had previously missed. Wikiacc (¶) 17:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.