This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Comment: We have a problem here. The subject is likely a notable academic, and this could, technically, be accepted and allowed to take its chance in mainspace. Our role is to accept drafts which we think have a better than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion process. As written and referenced I view its chances as close to 50% for survival, but below thatWhy?Because you have not given a single reference that shows the following:For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.I'm willing to accept the draft on the basis of likely notability, but please, just one really good reference and it will make reviewing it a lot easier. Talk to me on my talk page if it will help you. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It doesn't seem like you've changed anything since the last review. Please take the reviews as a way to improve the article before it gets looked at again. LR.127 (talk) 05:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I think this is notable per WP:NACADEMIC, but please cite the DOB, and remove the masked interlanguage links to es.wiki, as well as the inline external link. The text also needs copyediting, but that can be done post-publication. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: We have a problem here. The subject is likely a notable academic, and this could, technically, be accepted and allowed to take its chance in mainspace. Our role is to accept drafts which we think have a better than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion process. As written and referenced I view its chances as close to 50% for survival, but below thatWhy?Because you have not given a single reference that shows the following:For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.I'm willing to accept the draft on the basis of likely notability, but please, just one really good reference and it will make reviewing it a lot easier. Talk to me on my talk page if it will help you. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)